TY - JOUR
T1 - Upstream oversight assessment for agrifood nanotechnology
T2 - A case studies approach
AU - Kuzma, Jennifer
AU - Romanchek, James
AU - Kokotovich, Adam
PY - 2008/8
Y1 - 2008/8
N2 - Although nanotechnology is broadly receiving attention in public and academic circles, oversight issues associated with applications for agriculture and food remain largely unexplored. Agrifood nanotechnology is at a critical stage in which informed analysis can help shape funding priorities, risk assessment, and oversight activities. This analysis is designed to help society and policymakers anticipate and prepare for challenges posed by complicated, convergent applications of agrifood nanotechnology. The goal is to identify data, risk assessment, regulatory policy, and engagement needs for overseeing these products so they can be addressed prior to market entry. Our approach, termed upstream oversight assessment (UOA), has potential as a key element of anticipatory governance. It relies on distinct case studies of proposed applications of agrifood nanotechnology to highlight areas that need study and attention. As a tool for preparation, UOA anticipates the types and features of emerging applications; their endpoints of use in society; the extent to which users, workers, ecosystems, or consumers will be exposed; the nature of the material and its safety; whether and where the technologies might fit into current regulatory system(s); the strengths and weaknesses of the system(s) in light of these novel applications; and the possible social concerns related to oversight for them.
AB - Although nanotechnology is broadly receiving attention in public and academic circles, oversight issues associated with applications for agriculture and food remain largely unexplored. Agrifood nanotechnology is at a critical stage in which informed analysis can help shape funding priorities, risk assessment, and oversight activities. This analysis is designed to help society and policymakers anticipate and prepare for challenges posed by complicated, convergent applications of agrifood nanotechnology. The goal is to identify data, risk assessment, regulatory policy, and engagement needs for overseeing these products so they can be addressed prior to market entry. Our approach, termed upstream oversight assessment (UOA), has potential as a key element of anticipatory governance. It relies on distinct case studies of proposed applications of agrifood nanotechnology to highlight areas that need study and attention. As a tool for preparation, UOA anticipates the types and features of emerging applications; their endpoints of use in society; the extent to which users, workers, ecosystems, or consumers will be exposed; the nature of the material and its safety; whether and where the technologies might fit into current regulatory system(s); the strengths and weaknesses of the system(s) in light of these novel applications; and the possible social concerns related to oversight for them.
KW - Agriculture
KW - Food
KW - Nanotechnology
KW - Oversight
KW - Risk
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=48349093922&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=48349093922&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01071.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01071.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 18627547
AN - SCOPUS:48349093922
SN - 0272-4332
VL - 28
SP - 1081
EP - 1098
JO - Risk Analysis
JF - Risk Analysis
IS - 4
ER -