TY - JOUR
T1 - Updates and controversies in the management of uterine serous carcinoma and uterine carcinosarcoma
AU - Toboni, Michael
AU - Kurnit, Katherine
AU - Erickson, Britt
AU - Powell, Matthew
AU - Secord, Angeles Alvarez
AU - Fader, Amanda N.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025
PY - 2025/3
Y1 - 2025/3
N2 - Uterine serous carcinoma and uterine carcinosarcoma are among the rarest but most lethal endometrial cancer sub-types, accounting for 15% of all cases, and are responsible for more than 50% of related deaths. These malignancies are distinguished by a high likelihood of metastasis and multisite recurrence, making them biologically different from other endometrial cancer sub-types. This review aims to analyze the existing evidence regarding molecular classification, new biomarkers, and innovative treatment approaches for these high-risk tumors. Herein, we explored the role of biomarkers, including HER2, TP53, and mismatch repair deficiency/microsatellite instability hypermutated and their influence on treatment strategies, surveillance approaches, the potential role of circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid, novel precision-based treatment options, and disparate survival outcomes for non-Hispanic Black and other underserved minority patients, along with strategies to improve outcomes for these patients. Substantial progress has been made in the last 5 years, prompting the following question: What lies ahead in the next 5 years? Our current understanding of uterine serous carcinoma and carcinosarcoma underscores the necessity of continuing to prioritize biomarker-driven therapies and the development of novel treatments through clinical trials while integrating these new strategies with traditional approaches, such as surgical resection and cytotoxic chemotherapy.
AB - Uterine serous carcinoma and uterine carcinosarcoma are among the rarest but most lethal endometrial cancer sub-types, accounting for 15% of all cases, and are responsible for more than 50% of related deaths. These malignancies are distinguished by a high likelihood of metastasis and multisite recurrence, making them biologically different from other endometrial cancer sub-types. This review aims to analyze the existing evidence regarding molecular classification, new biomarkers, and innovative treatment approaches for these high-risk tumors. Herein, we explored the role of biomarkers, including HER2, TP53, and mismatch repair deficiency/microsatellite instability hypermutated and their influence on treatment strategies, surveillance approaches, the potential role of circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid, novel precision-based treatment options, and disparate survival outcomes for non-Hispanic Black and other underserved minority patients, along with strategies to improve outcomes for these patients. Substantial progress has been made in the last 5 years, prompting the following question: What lies ahead in the next 5 years? Our current understanding of uterine serous carcinoma and carcinosarcoma underscores the necessity of continuing to prioritize biomarker-driven therapies and the development of novel treatments through clinical trials while integrating these new strategies with traditional approaches, such as surgical resection and cytotoxic chemotherapy.
KW - Chemotherapy
KW - Endometrial Cancer
KW - Immunotherapy
KW - Targeted Therapy
KW - Uterine Cancer
KW - Uterine Carcinosarcoma
KW - Uterine Serous Carcinoma
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=86000160274&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=86000160274&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101672
DO - 10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101672
M3 - Review article
C2 - 40056788
AN - SCOPUS:86000160274
SN - 1048-891X
VL - 35
JO - International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
JF - International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
IS - 3
M1 - 101672
ER -