Universal Principled Review: A Community-Driven Method to Improve Peer Review

The Future Immunology Consortium

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

2 Scopus citations


Despite being a staple of our science, the process of pre-publication peer review has few agreed-upon standards defining its goals or ideal execution. As a community of reviewers and authors, we assembled an evaluation format and associated specific standards for the process as we think it should be practiced. We propose that we apply, debate, and ultimately extend these to improve the transparency of our criticism and the speed with which quality data and ideas become public.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1441-1445
Number of pages5
Issue number7
StatePublished - Dec 12 2019

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
These ideas came out of discourse at a meeting of immunologists in Skamania, WA in June 2019 (Immuno-Skamania) organized by Mark Ansel, Ananda Goldrath, Max Krummel, and Marion Pepper. We thank all attendees, Burroughs Wellcome Trust, and UCSF ImmunoX Initiative for funding to help defray the costs of the meeting. We thank Vincent Chan and Isabelle Tingin for assistance in preparing the manuscript.

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Universal Principled Review: A Community-Driven Method to Improve Peer Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this