Background: Rural hospitals in the United States have demonstrated lower adherence to evidence based guidelines than their urban counterparts in national public reporting initiatives. We compared the quality of rural hospitals participating in a public reporting initiative to that of their urban counterparts using Hospital Compare, a new national database containing process measures. Methods: Cross-sectional analyses of hospitals participating in Hospital Compare in 2005, evaluating percent adherence to guidelines for 10 processes of care for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure (HF), and community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) using multivariable linear regression analyses. Results: Participating rural hospitals demonstrated lower adherence to evidence based guidelines in MI and HF quality measures (p < 0.05) and higher adherence to prescribing antibiotics in a timely manner in CAP (p < 0.05). Differences increased with bed size (F test for linear trend, p < 0.05). After adjustment, the trends demonstrating lower adherence persisted in 6 AMI and HF measures and higher adherence in 1 CAP measure in spite of a disproportionate number of drop-outs among lower performing urban hospitals. Conclusions: Participating rural hospitals had lower performance than their urban counterparts. As the rural/urban quality gap varies by condition, bed size, and participation, we recommend comparing performance across a wide variety of condition-specific measures to enable targeted quality improvement.
|Original language||English (US)|
|Number of pages||16|
|State||Published - Jul 2008|
Bibliographical noteFunding Information:
This research was supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, an Investigator Award from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, and the California Program on Access to Care.
Copyright 2008 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
- Healthcare disparities
- Quality of healthcare
- Rural hospitals