Unfair discrimination in the employment interview

Legal and psychological aspects

Richard D Arvey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

159 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Reviews the psychological and legal literature concerning evidence of bias or unfairness in the employment interview with regard to Blacks, females, handicapped persons, and the elderly. This review indicates that (a) the interview is highly vulnerable to legal attack, and one can expect more litigation in this area; (b) the mechanisms and processes that contribute to bias in the interview are not well specified by researchers; (c) findings based predominantly on resume research show that females tend to receive lower evaluations than males, but this varies as a function of job and other situational characteristics; (d) little evidence exists to confirm the notion that Blacks are evaluated unfairly in interview contexts; (e) a relative dearth of research exists investigating interview bias against the elderly and handicapped individuals; and (f) evidence concerning the differential validity of the interview for these minority and nonminority groups is virtually nonexistent. A number of research needs and directions are specified. (79 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)736-765
Number of pages30
JournalPsychological Bulletin
Volume86
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 1979

Fingerprint

Psychological Interviews
Jurisprudence
Interviews
Disabled Persons
Research
Minority Groups
Employment Interviews
Psychological
Discrimination
Research Personnel
Psychology

Keywords

  • psychological & legal aspects, discrimination in employment interview against Blacks & females & handicapped & aged, literature review

Cite this

Unfair discrimination in the employment interview : Legal and psychological aspects. / Arvey, Richard D.

In: Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 86, No. 4, 01.07.1979, p. 736-765.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{53a6039bccb64c479a746a3a4cff296d,
title = "Unfair discrimination in the employment interview: Legal and psychological aspects",
abstract = "Reviews the psychological and legal literature concerning evidence of bias or unfairness in the employment interview with regard to Blacks, females, handicapped persons, and the elderly. This review indicates that (a) the interview is highly vulnerable to legal attack, and one can expect more litigation in this area; (b) the mechanisms and processes that contribute to bias in the interview are not well specified by researchers; (c) findings based predominantly on resume research show that females tend to receive lower evaluations than males, but this varies as a function of job and other situational characteristics; (d) little evidence exists to confirm the notion that Blacks are evaluated unfairly in interview contexts; (e) a relative dearth of research exists investigating interview bias against the elderly and handicapped individuals; and (f) evidence concerning the differential validity of the interview for these minority and nonminority groups is virtually nonexistent. A number of research needs and directions are specified. (79 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).",
keywords = "psychological & legal aspects, discrimination in employment interview against Blacks & females & handicapped & aged, literature review",
author = "Arvey, {Richard D}",
year = "1979",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/0033-2909.86.4.736",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "86",
pages = "736--765",
journal = "Psychological Bulletin",
issn = "0033-2909",
publisher = "American Psychological Association",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unfair discrimination in the employment interview

T2 - Legal and psychological aspects

AU - Arvey, Richard D

PY - 1979/7/1

Y1 - 1979/7/1

N2 - Reviews the psychological and legal literature concerning evidence of bias or unfairness in the employment interview with regard to Blacks, females, handicapped persons, and the elderly. This review indicates that (a) the interview is highly vulnerable to legal attack, and one can expect more litigation in this area; (b) the mechanisms and processes that contribute to bias in the interview are not well specified by researchers; (c) findings based predominantly on resume research show that females tend to receive lower evaluations than males, but this varies as a function of job and other situational characteristics; (d) little evidence exists to confirm the notion that Blacks are evaluated unfairly in interview contexts; (e) a relative dearth of research exists investigating interview bias against the elderly and handicapped individuals; and (f) evidence concerning the differential validity of the interview for these minority and nonminority groups is virtually nonexistent. A number of research needs and directions are specified. (79 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

AB - Reviews the psychological and legal literature concerning evidence of bias or unfairness in the employment interview with regard to Blacks, females, handicapped persons, and the elderly. This review indicates that (a) the interview is highly vulnerable to legal attack, and one can expect more litigation in this area; (b) the mechanisms and processes that contribute to bias in the interview are not well specified by researchers; (c) findings based predominantly on resume research show that females tend to receive lower evaluations than males, but this varies as a function of job and other situational characteristics; (d) little evidence exists to confirm the notion that Blacks are evaluated unfairly in interview contexts; (e) a relative dearth of research exists investigating interview bias against the elderly and handicapped individuals; and (f) evidence concerning the differential validity of the interview for these minority and nonminority groups is virtually nonexistent. A number of research needs and directions are specified. (79 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

KW - psychological & legal aspects, discrimination in employment interview against Blacks & females & handicapped & aged, literature review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000196150&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0000196150&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0033-2909.86.4.736

DO - 10.1037/0033-2909.86.4.736

M3 - Article

VL - 86

SP - 736

EP - 765

JO - Psychological Bulletin

JF - Psychological Bulletin

SN - 0033-2909

IS - 4

ER -