Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
Experts@Minnesota Home
Home
Profiles
Research units
University Assets
Projects and Grants
Research output
Datasets
Press/Media
Activities
Fellowships, Honors, and Prizes
Impacts
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods
Anne G. Copay
, Brian R. Subach
, Steven D. Glassman
, David W. Polly
, Thomas C. Schuler
Orthopaedic Surgery
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Review article
›
peer-review
1376
Scopus citations
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Nursing and Health Professions
Patient-Reported Outcome
100%
Patient Satisfaction
100%
Statistical Bias
100%
Spine Surgery
100%
Keyphrases
Minimal Clinically Important Difference
100%
Patient Assessment
8%
Treatment Options
8%
Patient-reported Outcomes
8%
Specific Treatment
8%
Patient Satisfaction
8%
Spinal Surgery
8%
Patient-centered Intervention
8%
External Criteria
8%
Patient Perspective
8%
Change Score
8%
Criteria-based
8%
Accurate Determination
8%
New Standards
8%
Distribution-based Methods
8%
Anchor Distribution
8%
Anchor-based
8%
Post-treatment Changes
8%
Statistical Bias
8%
Treatment Interventions
8%