Abstract
A sense of connectedness for men was hypothesized to be based on relationships that emphasize forms of social comparison, whereas a sense of connectedness for women was hypothesized to be based on relationships that emphasize forms of intimacy and physical proximity. The results from this study generally supported the hypotheses for both women and men. For women, relationships that emphasized reliable alliance and not guidance contributed to social connectedness. For men, relationships that emphasized reassurance of worth but not reliable alliance or opportunity for nurturance contributed to social connectedness. Differences in how women and men construct social connectedness are discussed in terms of counseling implications and future research.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 484-491 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Journal of Counseling and Development |
Volume | 78 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2000 |