Understanding how health journalists judge public relations sources: A rules theory approach

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

24 Scopus citations

Abstract

The research presented here offers public relations practitioners and scholars insight about how health journalists (N = 598) view practitioners and evaluate the appropriateness of public relations materials by public relations source (e.g., nonprofit, government). Also assessed are differences in journalist perceptions according to medium (e.g., newspapers, magazines) and market (e.g., national, metropolitan). Rules theory guides the analysis, allowing practitioners to discern journalists' general and specific rules for accepting publicity materials. Findings show that health journalists are least accepting of material from businesses and federal government agencies. Newspaper and freelance health journalists are more reluctant to use public relations materials than are other journalists.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)56-65
Number of pages10
JournalPublic Relations Review
Volume35
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2009
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Health
  • Journalist
  • Media relations
  • Perceptions
  • Public relations
  • Rules
  • Source-reporter relationship

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding how health journalists judge public relations sources: A rules theory approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this