Understanding and managing conservation conflicts

Steve M. Redpath, Juliette Young, Anna Evely, William M. Adams, William J. Sutherland, Andrew Whitehouse, Arjun Amar, Robert A. Lambert, John D.C. Linnell, Allan Watt, R. J. Gutiérrez

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

430 Scopus citations

Abstract

Conservation conflicts are increasing and need to be managed to minimise negative impacts on biodiversity, human livelihoods, and human well-being. Here, we explore strategies and case studies that highlight the long-term, dynamic nature of conflicts and the challenges to their management. Conflict management requires parties to recognise problems as shared ones, and engage with clear goals, a transparent evidence base, and an awareness of trade-offs. We hypothesise that conservation outcomes will be less durable when conservationists assert their interests to the detriment of others. Effective conflict management and long-term conservation benefit will be enhanced by better integration of the underpinning social context with the material impacts and evaluation of the efficacy of alternative conflict management approaches.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)100-109
Number of pages10
JournalTrends in Ecology and Evolution
Volume28
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2013

    Fingerprint

Cite this

Redpath, S. M., Young, J., Evely, A., Adams, W. M., Sutherland, W. J., Whitehouse, A., Amar, A., Lambert, R. A., Linnell, J. D. C., Watt, A., & Gutiérrez, R. J. (2013). Understanding and managing conservation conflicts. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 28(2), 100-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2012.08.021