Twitter accounts followed by congressional health staff

David Grande, Zachary F. Meisel, Raina M. Merchant, Jane Seymour, Sarah E Gollust

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Although health policy research should inform policy making, the communication gap between researchers and policy makers limits successful translation. Social media represents a new opportunity to connect researchers and policy makers. Our objective was to assess who Congressional health policy staff follow on a major social media platform. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Our study measured Congressional health policy staff's use of Twitter and the types of individuals and organizations they follow. To focus on more influential Twitter accounts, we restricted our sample to those followed by at least 3 individual Congressional staff members. RESULTS: Of the 30,843 accounts followed by the 115 Congressional health policy staff, 1273 were potentially policy-related and followed by 3 or more staff. Of these, few were academically affiliated (2.4%) or explicitly health-related (5.6%) sites; many were general news media sources (50.9%) and political and governmental sources (36.4%). Health-focused accounts were frequently connected to the news media or government rather than academia. Top accounts followed (ie, highest quintile) were most likely to be national news organizations (odds ratio [OR], 5.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.75-19.7) and elected officials (OR, 8.22; 95% CI, 1.75-38.6) compared with advocacy and interest groups. CONCLUSIONS: Health-related and academic sources are largely absent from the Twitter conversations with US Congressional health policy staff. Even within social media, traditional and political news media are important information intermediaries that researchers and journals should target to disseminate health policy evidence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e238-e244
JournalAmerican Journal of Managed Care
Volume23
Issue number7
StatePublished - Jul 1 2017

Fingerprint

Health Policy
Social Media
Health
Research Personnel
Administrative Personnel
Odds Ratio
Organizations
Confidence Intervals
Public Opinion
Policy Making
Cross-Sectional Studies
Communication
Research

Cite this

Grande, D., Meisel, Z. F., Merchant, R. M., Seymour, J., & Gollust, S. E. (2017). Twitter accounts followed by congressional health staff. American Journal of Managed Care, 23(7), e238-e244.

Twitter accounts followed by congressional health staff. / Grande, David; Meisel, Zachary F.; Merchant, Raina M.; Seymour, Jane; Gollust, Sarah E.

In: American Journal of Managed Care, Vol. 23, No. 7, 01.07.2017, p. e238-e244.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Grande, D, Meisel, ZF, Merchant, RM, Seymour, J & Gollust, SE 2017, 'Twitter accounts followed by congressional health staff', American Journal of Managed Care, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. e238-e244.
Grande D, Meisel ZF, Merchant RM, Seymour J, Gollust SE. Twitter accounts followed by congressional health staff. American Journal of Managed Care. 2017 Jul 1;23(7):e238-e244.
Grande, David ; Meisel, Zachary F. ; Merchant, Raina M. ; Seymour, Jane ; Gollust, Sarah E. / Twitter accounts followed by congressional health staff. In: American Journal of Managed Care. 2017 ; Vol. 23, No. 7. pp. e238-e244.
@article{98fc239af3584f008aced240dcdae309,
title = "Twitter accounts followed by congressional health staff",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: Although health policy research should inform policy making, the communication gap between researchers and policy makers limits successful translation. Social media represents a new opportunity to connect researchers and policy makers. Our objective was to assess who Congressional health policy staff follow on a major social media platform. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Our study measured Congressional health policy staff's use of Twitter and the types of individuals and organizations they follow. To focus on more influential Twitter accounts, we restricted our sample to those followed by at least 3 individual Congressional staff members. RESULTS: Of the 30,843 accounts followed by the 115 Congressional health policy staff, 1273 were potentially policy-related and followed by 3 or more staff. Of these, few were academically affiliated (2.4{\%}) or explicitly health-related (5.6{\%}) sites; many were general news media sources (50.9{\%}) and political and governmental sources (36.4{\%}). Health-focused accounts were frequently connected to the news media or government rather than academia. Top accounts followed (ie, highest quintile) were most likely to be national news organizations (odds ratio [OR], 5.88; 95{\%} confidence interval [CI], 1.75-19.7) and elected officials (OR, 8.22; 95{\%} CI, 1.75-38.6) compared with advocacy and interest groups. CONCLUSIONS: Health-related and academic sources are largely absent from the Twitter conversations with US Congressional health policy staff. Even within social media, traditional and political news media are important information intermediaries that researchers and journals should target to disseminate health policy evidence.",
author = "David Grande and Meisel, {Zachary F.} and Merchant, {Raina M.} and Jane Seymour and Gollust, {Sarah E}",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "e238--e244",
journal = "American Journal of Managed Care",
issn = "1088-0224",
publisher = "Ascend Media",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Twitter accounts followed by congressional health staff

AU - Grande, David

AU - Meisel, Zachary F.

AU - Merchant, Raina M.

AU - Seymour, Jane

AU - Gollust, Sarah E

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - OBJECTIVES: Although health policy research should inform policy making, the communication gap between researchers and policy makers limits successful translation. Social media represents a new opportunity to connect researchers and policy makers. Our objective was to assess who Congressional health policy staff follow on a major social media platform. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Our study measured Congressional health policy staff's use of Twitter and the types of individuals and organizations they follow. To focus on more influential Twitter accounts, we restricted our sample to those followed by at least 3 individual Congressional staff members. RESULTS: Of the 30,843 accounts followed by the 115 Congressional health policy staff, 1273 were potentially policy-related and followed by 3 or more staff. Of these, few were academically affiliated (2.4%) or explicitly health-related (5.6%) sites; many were general news media sources (50.9%) and political and governmental sources (36.4%). Health-focused accounts were frequently connected to the news media or government rather than academia. Top accounts followed (ie, highest quintile) were most likely to be national news organizations (odds ratio [OR], 5.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.75-19.7) and elected officials (OR, 8.22; 95% CI, 1.75-38.6) compared with advocacy and interest groups. CONCLUSIONS: Health-related and academic sources are largely absent from the Twitter conversations with US Congressional health policy staff. Even within social media, traditional and political news media are important information intermediaries that researchers and journals should target to disseminate health policy evidence.

AB - OBJECTIVES: Although health policy research should inform policy making, the communication gap between researchers and policy makers limits successful translation. Social media represents a new opportunity to connect researchers and policy makers. Our objective was to assess who Congressional health policy staff follow on a major social media platform. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Our study measured Congressional health policy staff's use of Twitter and the types of individuals and organizations they follow. To focus on more influential Twitter accounts, we restricted our sample to those followed by at least 3 individual Congressional staff members. RESULTS: Of the 30,843 accounts followed by the 115 Congressional health policy staff, 1273 were potentially policy-related and followed by 3 or more staff. Of these, few were academically affiliated (2.4%) or explicitly health-related (5.6%) sites; many were general news media sources (50.9%) and political and governmental sources (36.4%). Health-focused accounts were frequently connected to the news media or government rather than academia. Top accounts followed (ie, highest quintile) were most likely to be national news organizations (odds ratio [OR], 5.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.75-19.7) and elected officials (OR, 8.22; 95% CI, 1.75-38.6) compared with advocacy and interest groups. CONCLUSIONS: Health-related and academic sources are largely absent from the Twitter conversations with US Congressional health policy staff. Even within social media, traditional and political news media are important information intermediaries that researchers and journals should target to disseminate health policy evidence.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026770837&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85026770837&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 28850791

AN - SCOPUS:85026770837

VL - 23

SP - e238-e244

JO - American Journal of Managed Care

JF - American Journal of Managed Care

SN - 1088-0224

IS - 7

ER -