TY - JOUR
T1 - TU‐C‐T‐6E‐10
T2 - Using Fluence‐Separation to Account for Energy Spectra Dependence in Computing Dosimetric ASi EPID Images for IMRT Fields
AU - Li, W.
AU - Moore, J.
AU - Siebers, J.
PY - 2005/6
Y1 - 2005/6
N2 - Purpose: Dosimetric aSi EPID images are typically computed using a convolution of energy fluence with an invariant energy deposition kernel. However, Monte Carlo (MC) studies show a strong dependence of the EPID imager response to energy spectra, which, for highly modulated IMRT fields, severely affects the dosimetric accuracy. To account for this, a method is developed that accounts for the radial‐dependence of the energy deposition kernel and considers open field and MLC hardened components of the energy fluence. Method and Materials: Dosimetric EPID images are created by convolving energy fluence with a radially dependent kernel. The energy fluence at the EPID surface was determined by extracting the terma in water from Pinnacle. For each fluence element, the energy fluence (Ψ) was divided into two parts — open field energy fluence Ψo, and MLC blocked field energy fluence Ψc. Ψo and Ψc were convolved separately with their respective energy‐deposition kernels and the results summed. Calculations were compared with measurements for, 3×3–20×20 cm2 fields, rectangular fields, a 10×10 cm2 field centered at (5cm,−5cm)), 3×3–12×12 cm2 MLC‐blocked fields, and dynamic MLC sliding window fields which generate 10×10 cm2 fields with window gaps ranging from 1‐ to 50‐mm.Test cases were compared utilizing profiles and using gamma‐analysis for pixels receiving doses >50 % Dmax. A 3 mm, 3% criteria was used in the gamma analysis. Results: Measured and computed dose profiles agreed for both in‐field and out‐of‐field regions. For the open field test cases, all points evaluated had γ < 1.0. For MLC blocked fields ⩽10×10 cm2, >98.5% of points had γ 1.0 Over 98% of points passed the gamma‐test for most sliding window field. Conclusion: Accurate aSi dosimetric EPID images can be computed when energy spectra hardening is accounted for during the image calculation. Conflict of Interest: This work supported in‐part by Varian Medical Systems.
AB - Purpose: Dosimetric aSi EPID images are typically computed using a convolution of energy fluence with an invariant energy deposition kernel. However, Monte Carlo (MC) studies show a strong dependence of the EPID imager response to energy spectra, which, for highly modulated IMRT fields, severely affects the dosimetric accuracy. To account for this, a method is developed that accounts for the radial‐dependence of the energy deposition kernel and considers open field and MLC hardened components of the energy fluence. Method and Materials: Dosimetric EPID images are created by convolving energy fluence with a radially dependent kernel. The energy fluence at the EPID surface was determined by extracting the terma in water from Pinnacle. For each fluence element, the energy fluence (Ψ) was divided into two parts — open field energy fluence Ψo, and MLC blocked field energy fluence Ψc. Ψo and Ψc were convolved separately with their respective energy‐deposition kernels and the results summed. Calculations were compared with measurements for, 3×3–20×20 cm2 fields, rectangular fields, a 10×10 cm2 field centered at (5cm,−5cm)), 3×3–12×12 cm2 MLC‐blocked fields, and dynamic MLC sliding window fields which generate 10×10 cm2 fields with window gaps ranging from 1‐ to 50‐mm.Test cases were compared utilizing profiles and using gamma‐analysis for pixels receiving doses >50 % Dmax. A 3 mm, 3% criteria was used in the gamma analysis. Results: Measured and computed dose profiles agreed for both in‐field and out‐of‐field regions. For the open field test cases, all points evaluated had γ < 1.0. For MLC blocked fields ⩽10×10 cm2, >98.5% of points had γ 1.0 Over 98% of points passed the gamma‐test for most sliding window field. Conclusion: Accurate aSi dosimetric EPID images can be computed when energy spectra hardening is accounted for during the image calculation. Conflict of Interest: This work supported in‐part by Varian Medical Systems.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024810708&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024810708&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1118/1.1998378
DO - 10.1118/1.1998378
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85024810708
SN - 0094-2405
VL - 32
SP - 2091
JO - Medical Physics
JF - Medical Physics
IS - 6
ER -