Tuberculosis surveillance and its discontents: The ethical paradox

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

In June 2017, the World Health Organization issued the Guidelines on Ethical Issues in Public Health Surveillance. Using the frame of public health ethics, the guidance declared that countries have an affirmative duty to undertake surveillance and that the global community had an obligation to support those countries whose resources limited their capacity. The centrality of TB surveillance has long been recognized as a matter of public health practice and ethics. Nevertheless, contemporary global realities make clear that TB surveillance falls far short of the goal of uniform notification. It is this reality that necessitated the paradoxical turn to research studies that require informed consent and human subjects' ethical review, the very burdens that mandated notification were designed to overcome.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)9-14
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease
Volume24
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2020
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Union

Keywords

  • Public health ethics
  • Surveillance
  • Tuberculosis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Tuberculosis surveillance and its discontents: The ethical paradox'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this