Trends in transition from pediatric to adult health care services for young adults with chronic conditions

Peter B Scal, Theora Evans, Shelley Blozis, Nancy Okinow, Robert Blum

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

145 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The rationale underlying this study was the need to move the transition health services model from a theoretical framework to an empirically-based investigation. Thus, it was necessary to identify programs for youth with chronic or disabling conditions that assist in transitioning from child- to adult-focused health services by (a) discrete types, (b) functional categories, and (c) problems and issues faced by these programs. Methods: Nominations for transition health services programs were solicited from 1025 organizational agencies at the local, state, regional, and national levels. Two solicitations yielded 277 nominees. After pilot testing, a survey of 163 forced responses and open-ended questions was mailed to each nominated transition health services program. A total of 122 programs returned completed surveys. Results: Program services were categorized as adolescent- focused (38%), condition-focused (36%), and specialty-specific programs (26%). Few programs were primary care-based. Categories were subsequently collapsed into two types: adolescent-focused and condition-focused. No significant differences were noted between adolescent- and condition-focused programs regarding provision of mental health services, vocational counseling, self-efficacy training, or health education. The primary barriers to transition health services were identified as funding and access to key staff, rather than family and adolescent resistance. Conclusion: In general, self-identified transition health care programs do not achieve the goal of collaborative, coordinated, and integrative services to adolescents with chronic or disabling conditions. Furthermore, the barriers to attaining the goal are the limitations of the health care system itself.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)259-264
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Adolescent Health
Volume24
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1999

Fingerprint

Health Services
Young Adult
Pediatrics
Delivery of Health Care
Patient Transfer
Mental Health Services
Self Efficacy
Health Education
Counseling
Primary Health Care
Theoretical Models
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Adult-focused care
  • Anticipatory guidance
  • Chronic physical conditions
  • Transition health services/programs

Cite this

Trends in transition from pediatric to adult health care services for young adults with chronic conditions. / Scal, Peter B; Evans, Theora; Blozis, Shelley; Okinow, Nancy; Blum, Robert.

In: Journal of Adolescent Health, Vol. 24, No. 4, 01.01.1999, p. 259-264.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Scal, Peter B ; Evans, Theora ; Blozis, Shelley ; Okinow, Nancy ; Blum, Robert. / Trends in transition from pediatric to adult health care services for young adults with chronic conditions. In: Journal of Adolescent Health. 1999 ; Vol. 24, No. 4. pp. 259-264.
@article{626d334bab5b4b9683494129848d282d,
title = "Trends in transition from pediatric to adult health care services for young adults with chronic conditions",
abstract = "Purpose: The rationale underlying this study was the need to move the transition health services model from a theoretical framework to an empirically-based investigation. Thus, it was necessary to identify programs for youth with chronic or disabling conditions that assist in transitioning from child- to adult-focused health services by (a) discrete types, (b) functional categories, and (c) problems and issues faced by these programs. Methods: Nominations for transition health services programs were solicited from 1025 organizational agencies at the local, state, regional, and national levels. Two solicitations yielded 277 nominees. After pilot testing, a survey of 163 forced responses and open-ended questions was mailed to each nominated transition health services program. A total of 122 programs returned completed surveys. Results: Program services were categorized as adolescent- focused (38{\%}), condition-focused (36{\%}), and specialty-specific programs (26{\%}). Few programs were primary care-based. Categories were subsequently collapsed into two types: adolescent-focused and condition-focused. No significant differences were noted between adolescent- and condition-focused programs regarding provision of mental health services, vocational counseling, self-efficacy training, or health education. The primary barriers to transition health services were identified as funding and access to key staff, rather than family and adolescent resistance. Conclusion: In general, self-identified transition health care programs do not achieve the goal of collaborative, coordinated, and integrative services to adolescents with chronic or disabling conditions. Furthermore, the barriers to attaining the goal are the limitations of the health care system itself.",
keywords = "Adult-focused care, Anticipatory guidance, Chronic physical conditions, Transition health services/programs",
author = "Scal, {Peter B} and Theora Evans and Shelley Blozis and Nancy Okinow and Robert Blum",
year = "1999",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S1054-139X(98)00127-X",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "259--264",
journal = "Journal of Adolescent Health",
issn = "1054-139X",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trends in transition from pediatric to adult health care services for young adults with chronic conditions

AU - Scal, Peter B

AU - Evans, Theora

AU - Blozis, Shelley

AU - Okinow, Nancy

AU - Blum, Robert

PY - 1999/1/1

Y1 - 1999/1/1

N2 - Purpose: The rationale underlying this study was the need to move the transition health services model from a theoretical framework to an empirically-based investigation. Thus, it was necessary to identify programs for youth with chronic or disabling conditions that assist in transitioning from child- to adult-focused health services by (a) discrete types, (b) functional categories, and (c) problems and issues faced by these programs. Methods: Nominations for transition health services programs were solicited from 1025 organizational agencies at the local, state, regional, and national levels. Two solicitations yielded 277 nominees. After pilot testing, a survey of 163 forced responses and open-ended questions was mailed to each nominated transition health services program. A total of 122 programs returned completed surveys. Results: Program services were categorized as adolescent- focused (38%), condition-focused (36%), and specialty-specific programs (26%). Few programs were primary care-based. Categories were subsequently collapsed into two types: adolescent-focused and condition-focused. No significant differences were noted between adolescent- and condition-focused programs regarding provision of mental health services, vocational counseling, self-efficacy training, or health education. The primary barriers to transition health services were identified as funding and access to key staff, rather than family and adolescent resistance. Conclusion: In general, self-identified transition health care programs do not achieve the goal of collaborative, coordinated, and integrative services to adolescents with chronic or disabling conditions. Furthermore, the barriers to attaining the goal are the limitations of the health care system itself.

AB - Purpose: The rationale underlying this study was the need to move the transition health services model from a theoretical framework to an empirically-based investigation. Thus, it was necessary to identify programs for youth with chronic or disabling conditions that assist in transitioning from child- to adult-focused health services by (a) discrete types, (b) functional categories, and (c) problems and issues faced by these programs. Methods: Nominations for transition health services programs were solicited from 1025 organizational agencies at the local, state, regional, and national levels. Two solicitations yielded 277 nominees. After pilot testing, a survey of 163 forced responses and open-ended questions was mailed to each nominated transition health services program. A total of 122 programs returned completed surveys. Results: Program services were categorized as adolescent- focused (38%), condition-focused (36%), and specialty-specific programs (26%). Few programs were primary care-based. Categories were subsequently collapsed into two types: adolescent-focused and condition-focused. No significant differences were noted between adolescent- and condition-focused programs regarding provision of mental health services, vocational counseling, self-efficacy training, or health education. The primary barriers to transition health services were identified as funding and access to key staff, rather than family and adolescent resistance. Conclusion: In general, self-identified transition health care programs do not achieve the goal of collaborative, coordinated, and integrative services to adolescents with chronic or disabling conditions. Furthermore, the barriers to attaining the goal are the limitations of the health care system itself.

KW - Adult-focused care

KW - Anticipatory guidance

KW - Chronic physical conditions

KW - Transition health services/programs

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032927951&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032927951&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1054-139X(98)00127-X

DO - 10.1016/S1054-139X(98)00127-X

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 259

EP - 264

JO - Journal of Adolescent Health

JF - Journal of Adolescent Health

SN - 1054-139X

IS - 4

ER -