Treatment outcome evaluation methodology in smoking cessation: strengths and key issues

Harry A. Lando

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Scopus citations

Abstract

Dramatic improvements in both treatment evaluation and outcome have occurred in smoking cessation over the past 20 years. Key strengths include the use of multicomponent intervention strategies, objective outcome criteria, and relatively sophisticated research designs. Problems still remain, however, in establishing common definitions of success (or even of treatment participation), in describing treatment methodology, and in both defining and reducing subject attrition. Inadequate sample sizes have traditionally plagued studies in the smoking cessation field. Yet progress is being made in all of these areas. Prospects for further improvements in methodological sophistication and treatment outcome appear to be excellent.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)201-214
Number of pages14
JournalAdvances in Behaviour Research and Therapy
Volume11
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1989

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Treatment outcome evaluation methodology in smoking cessation: strengths and key issues'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this