Treating the physical symptoms of depression with second-generation antidepressants: A systematic review and metaanalysis

Erin E. Krebs, Bradley N. Gaynes, Gerald Gartlehner, Richard A. Hansen, Patricia Thieda, Laura C. Morgan, Angela DeVeaugh-Geiss, Kathleen N. Lohr

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

32 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Approximately two-thirds of patients with depression experience physical pain symptoms. Coexisting pain complicates the treatment of depression and is associated with worse depression outcomes. Objective: The authors reviewed the effect of newer antidepressants on pain in patients with depression. Method: The authors searched systematically for trials of second-generation antidepressants that enrolled depression patients and reported pain outcomes, pooling changes on the pain visual-analog scale (VAS), using random-effects models. Results: Eight trials were eligible. Pooled analysis of head-to-head trials showed no difference in VAS between duloxetine and paroxetine. Both drugs were superior to placebo. Conclusion: The authors found insufficient evidence to support the choice of one second-generation antidepressant over another in patients with pain accompanying depression.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)191-198
Number of pages8
JournalPsychosomatics
Volume49
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Dr. Krebs was supported by the Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program . Dr. Gaynes was supported in part by an NIMH K23 Career Development Award ( MH01951-03 ), and Dr. Hansen was supported by NIH grant K12 RR023248 .

Funding Information:
This research was funded through a contract from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality to the RTI International University of North Carolina Evidence-Based Practice Center (contract #290–02-0016 ).

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Treating the physical symptoms of depression with second-generation antidepressants: A systematic review and metaanalysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this