TY - JOUR
T1 - Translating Violence Prevention Programs from Research to Practice
T2 - SafERteens Implementation in an Urban Emergency Department
AU - Carter, Patrick M.
AU - Cunningham, Rebecca M.
AU - Eisman, Andria B.
AU - Resnicow, Ken
AU - Roche, Jessica S.
AU - Cole, Jennifer Tang
AU - Goldstick, Jason
AU - Kilbourne, Amy M.
AU - Walton, Maureen A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2022/1
Y1 - 2022/1
N2 - Background: Youth violence is a leading cause of adolescent mortality, underscoring the need to integrate evidence-based violence prevention programs into routine emergency department (ED) care. Objectives: To examine the translation of the SafERteens program into clinical care. Methods: Hospital staff provided input on implementation facilitators/barriers to inform toolkit development. Implementation was piloted in a four-arm effectiveness-implementation trial, with youth (ages 14–18 years) screening positive for past 3-month aggression randomized to either SafERteens (delivered remotely or in-person) or enhanced usual care (EUC; remote or in-person), with follow-up at post-test and 3 months. During maintenance, ED staff continued in-person SafERteens delivery and external facilitation was provided. Outcomes were measured using the RE-AIM implementation framework. Results: SafERteens completion rates were 77.6% (52/67) for remote and 49.1% (27/55) for in-person delivery. In addition to high acceptability ratings (e.g., helpfulness), post-test data demonstrated increased self-efficacy to avoid fighting among patients receiving remote (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09–1.36) and in-person (IRR 1.23, 95% CI 1.12–1.36) SafERteens, as well as decreased pro-violence attitudes among patients receiving remote (IRR 0.83, 95% CI 0.75–0.91) and in-person (IRR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77–0.99) SafERteens when compared with their respective EUC groups. At 3 months, youth receiving remote SafERteens reported less non-partner aggression (IRR 0.52, 95% CI 0.31–0.87, Cohen's d −0.39) and violence consequences (IRR 0.47, 95% CI 0.22–1.00, Cohen's d −0.49) compared with remote EUC; no differences were noted for in-person SafERteens delivery. Barriers to implementation maintenance included limited staff availability and a lack of reimbursement codes. Conclusions: Implementing behavioral interventions such as SafERteens into routine ED care is feasible using remote delivery. Policymakers should consider reimbursement for violence prevention services to sustain long-term implementation.
AB - Background: Youth violence is a leading cause of adolescent mortality, underscoring the need to integrate evidence-based violence prevention programs into routine emergency department (ED) care. Objectives: To examine the translation of the SafERteens program into clinical care. Methods: Hospital staff provided input on implementation facilitators/barriers to inform toolkit development. Implementation was piloted in a four-arm effectiveness-implementation trial, with youth (ages 14–18 years) screening positive for past 3-month aggression randomized to either SafERteens (delivered remotely or in-person) or enhanced usual care (EUC; remote or in-person), with follow-up at post-test and 3 months. During maintenance, ED staff continued in-person SafERteens delivery and external facilitation was provided. Outcomes were measured using the RE-AIM implementation framework. Results: SafERteens completion rates were 77.6% (52/67) for remote and 49.1% (27/55) for in-person delivery. In addition to high acceptability ratings (e.g., helpfulness), post-test data demonstrated increased self-efficacy to avoid fighting among patients receiving remote (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09–1.36) and in-person (IRR 1.23, 95% CI 1.12–1.36) SafERteens, as well as decreased pro-violence attitudes among patients receiving remote (IRR 0.83, 95% CI 0.75–0.91) and in-person (IRR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77–0.99) SafERteens when compared with their respective EUC groups. At 3 months, youth receiving remote SafERteens reported less non-partner aggression (IRR 0.52, 95% CI 0.31–0.87, Cohen's d −0.39) and violence consequences (IRR 0.47, 95% CI 0.22–1.00, Cohen's d −0.49) compared with remote EUC; no differences were noted for in-person SafERteens delivery. Barriers to implementation maintenance included limited staff availability and a lack of reimbursement codes. Conclusions: Implementing behavioral interventions such as SafERteens into routine ED care is feasible using remote delivery. Policymakers should consider reimbursement for violence prevention services to sustain long-term implementation.
KW - emergency departments
KW - implementation
KW - translation
KW - youth violence
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85119184127&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85119184127&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jemermed.2021.09.003
DO - 10.1016/j.jemermed.2021.09.003
M3 - Article
C2 - 34688506
AN - SCOPUS:85119184127
SN - 0736-4679
VL - 62
SP - 109
EP - 124
JO - Journal of Emergency Medicine
JF - Journal of Emergency Medicine
IS - 1
ER -