Translating Violence Prevention Programs from Research to Practice: SafERteens Implementation in an Urban Emergency Department

Patrick M. Carter, Rebecca M. Cunningham, Andria B. Eisman, Ken Resnicow, Jessica S. Roche, Jennifer Tang Cole, Jason Goldstick, Amy M. Kilbourne, Maureen A. Walton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Youth violence is a leading cause of adolescent mortality, underscoring the need to integrate evidence-based violence prevention programs into routine emergency department (ED) care. Objectives: To examine the translation of the SafERteens program into clinical care. Methods: Hospital staff provided input on implementation facilitators/barriers to inform toolkit development. Implementation was piloted in a four-arm effectiveness-implementation trial, with youth (ages 14–18 years) screening positive for past 3-month aggression randomized to either SafERteens (delivered remotely or in-person) or enhanced usual care (EUC; remote or in-person), with follow-up at post-test and 3 months. During maintenance, ED staff continued in-person SafERteens delivery and external facilitation was provided. Outcomes were measured using the RE-AIM implementation framework. Results: SafERteens completion rates were 77.6% (52/67) for remote and 49.1% (27/55) for in-person delivery. In addition to high acceptability ratings (e.g., helpfulness), post-test data demonstrated increased self-efficacy to avoid fighting among patients receiving remote (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09–1.36) and in-person (IRR 1.23, 95% CI 1.12–1.36) SafERteens, as well as decreased pro-violence attitudes among patients receiving remote (IRR 0.83, 95% CI 0.75–0.91) and in-person (IRR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77–0.99) SafERteens when compared with their respective EUC groups. At 3 months, youth receiving remote SafERteens reported less non-partner aggression (IRR 0.52, 95% CI 0.31–0.87, Cohen's d −0.39) and violence consequences (IRR 0.47, 95% CI 0.22–1.00, Cohen's d −0.49) compared with remote EUC; no differences were noted for in-person SafERteens delivery. Barriers to implementation maintenance included limited staff availability and a lack of reimbursement codes. Conclusions: Implementing behavioral interventions such as SafERteens into routine ED care is feasible using remote delivery. Policymakers should consider reimbursement for violence prevention services to sustain long-term implementation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)109-124
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Emergency Medicine
Volume62
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2022
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Inc.

Keywords

  • emergency departments
  • implementation
  • translation
  • youth violence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Translating Violence Prevention Programs from Research to Practice: SafERteens Implementation in an Urban Emergency Department'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this