Translating research for health policy decisions: Is it time for researchers to join social media?

Zachary F. Meisel, Sarah E. Gollust, David Grande

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Identifying effective strategies to translate research evidence to policy is a national priority and a priority of the health policy research community. Multiple channels exist to disseminate, translate, and communicate research evidence. Some thought leaders have specifically advocated for researchers to play a direct role in research dissemination, particularly through social media. However, this view remains controversial. This Commentary explores the current state of and future opportunities and barriers for alternative avenues of policy-relevant research dissemination. The authors identify four intersecting realities influencing the manner in which the health research community views and adopts various approaches to research translation: (1) persistent gaps in evidence translation and knowledge transfer, particularly in the realm of health policy; (2) public demand for scholars to embrace new modes of research dissemination; (3) the rapid growth and reach of social media to disseminate information; and (4) skepticism and confusion within the academic community about how best to use social media to disseminate policy-relevant research. They conclude that while scholars will need to be engaged in evidence translation to inform health policy, they may be best served by connecting with trusted intermediaries and knowledge brokers to promote efficient use of the best available evidence to answer the most timely policy questions. Journals and universities may be well positioned to invest in this capacity to curate research evidence and disseminate it using social media and other technologies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1341-1343
Number of pages3
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume91
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2016

Fingerprint

Social Media
Health Policy
social media
health policy
Research Personnel
Research
evidence
research policy
community
time
knowledge transfer
Translational Medical Research
leader
university
demand

Cite this

Translating research for health policy decisions : Is it time for researchers to join social media? / Meisel, Zachary F.; Gollust, Sarah E.; Grande, David.

In: Academic Medicine, Vol. 91, No. 10, 01.10.2016, p. 1341-1343.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{bdb17b87365646a9a8816d9ea0104372,
title = "Translating research for health policy decisions: Is it time for researchers to join social media?",
abstract = "Identifying effective strategies to translate research evidence to policy is a national priority and a priority of the health policy research community. Multiple channels exist to disseminate, translate, and communicate research evidence. Some thought leaders have specifically advocated for researchers to play a direct role in research dissemination, particularly through social media. However, this view remains controversial. This Commentary explores the current state of and future opportunities and barriers for alternative avenues of policy-relevant research dissemination. The authors identify four intersecting realities influencing the manner in which the health research community views and adopts various approaches to research translation: (1) persistent gaps in evidence translation and knowledge transfer, particularly in the realm of health policy; (2) public demand for scholars to embrace new modes of research dissemination; (3) the rapid growth and reach of social media to disseminate information; and (4) skepticism and confusion within the academic community about how best to use social media to disseminate policy-relevant research. They conclude that while scholars will need to be engaged in evidence translation to inform health policy, they may be best served by connecting with trusted intermediaries and knowledge brokers to promote efficient use of the best available evidence to answer the most timely policy questions. Journals and universities may be well positioned to invest in this capacity to curate research evidence and disseminate it using social media and other technologies.",
author = "Meisel, {Zachary F.} and Gollust, {Sarah E.} and David Grande",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/ACM.0000000000001182",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "91",
pages = "1341--1343",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Translating research for health policy decisions

T2 - Is it time for researchers to join social media?

AU - Meisel, Zachary F.

AU - Gollust, Sarah E.

AU - Grande, David

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

N2 - Identifying effective strategies to translate research evidence to policy is a national priority and a priority of the health policy research community. Multiple channels exist to disseminate, translate, and communicate research evidence. Some thought leaders have specifically advocated for researchers to play a direct role in research dissemination, particularly through social media. However, this view remains controversial. This Commentary explores the current state of and future opportunities and barriers for alternative avenues of policy-relevant research dissemination. The authors identify four intersecting realities influencing the manner in which the health research community views and adopts various approaches to research translation: (1) persistent gaps in evidence translation and knowledge transfer, particularly in the realm of health policy; (2) public demand for scholars to embrace new modes of research dissemination; (3) the rapid growth and reach of social media to disseminate information; and (4) skepticism and confusion within the academic community about how best to use social media to disseminate policy-relevant research. They conclude that while scholars will need to be engaged in evidence translation to inform health policy, they may be best served by connecting with trusted intermediaries and knowledge brokers to promote efficient use of the best available evidence to answer the most timely policy questions. Journals and universities may be well positioned to invest in this capacity to curate research evidence and disseminate it using social media and other technologies.

AB - Identifying effective strategies to translate research evidence to policy is a national priority and a priority of the health policy research community. Multiple channels exist to disseminate, translate, and communicate research evidence. Some thought leaders have specifically advocated for researchers to play a direct role in research dissemination, particularly through social media. However, this view remains controversial. This Commentary explores the current state of and future opportunities and barriers for alternative avenues of policy-relevant research dissemination. The authors identify four intersecting realities influencing the manner in which the health research community views and adopts various approaches to research translation: (1) persistent gaps in evidence translation and knowledge transfer, particularly in the realm of health policy; (2) public demand for scholars to embrace new modes of research dissemination; (3) the rapid growth and reach of social media to disseminate information; and (4) skepticism and confusion within the academic community about how best to use social media to disseminate policy-relevant research. They conclude that while scholars will need to be engaged in evidence translation to inform health policy, they may be best served by connecting with trusted intermediaries and knowledge brokers to promote efficient use of the best available evidence to answer the most timely policy questions. Journals and universities may be well positioned to invest in this capacity to curate research evidence and disseminate it using social media and other technologies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962464772&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962464772&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001182

DO - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001182

M3 - Review article

C2 - 27049543

AN - SCOPUS:84962464772

VL - 91

SP - 1341

EP - 1343

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 10

ER -