Transition to the new race/ethnicity data collection standards in the Department of Veterans Affairs

Min Woong Sohn, Huiyuan Zhang, Noreen Arnold, Kevin Stroupe, Brent C. Taylor, Timothy J. Wilt, Denise M. Hynes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

89 Scopus citations


Background: Patient race in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) information system was previously recorded based on an administrative or clinical employee's observation. Since 2003, the VA started to collect self-reported race in compliance with a new federal guideline. We investigated the implications of this transition for using race/ ethnicity data in multi-year trends in the VA and in other healthcare data systems that make the transition. Methods: All unique users of VA healthcare services with self-reported race/ethnicity data in 2004 were compared with their prior observer-recorded race/ethnicity data from 1997 - 2002 (N = 988,277). Results: In 2004, only about 39% of all VA healthcare users reported race/ethnicity values other than "unknown" or "declined." Females reported race/ethnicity at a lower rate than males (27% vs. 40%; p < 0.001). Over 95% of observer-recorded data agreed with self-reported data. Compared with the patient self-reported data, the observer-recorded White and African American races were accurate for 98% (kappa = 0.89) and 94% (kappa = 0.93) individuals, respectively. Accuracy of observer-recorded races was much worse for other minority groups with kappa coefficients ranging between 0.38 for American Indian or Alaskan Natives and 0.79 for Hispanic Whites. When observer-recorded race/ethnicity values were reclassified into non-African American groups, they agreed with the self-reported data for 98% of all individuals (kappa = 0.93). Conclusion: For overall VA healthcare users, the agreement between observer-recorded and self-reported race/ethnicity was excellent and observer-recorded and self-reported data can be used together for multi-year trends without creating serious bias. However, this study also showed that observation was not a reliable method of race/ethnicity data collection for non-African American minorities and racial disparity might be underestimated if observer-recorded data are used due to systematic patterns of inaccurate race/ethnicity assignments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number7
JournalPopulation Health Metrics
StatePublished - Jul 6 2006
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'Transition to the new race/ethnicity data collection standards in the Department of Veterans Affairs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this