Transdisciplinary unifying implications of circadian findings in the 1950s

Franz Halberg, Germaine G Cornelissen-Guillaume, George Katinas, Elena V. Syutkina, Robert B. Sothern, Rina Zaslavskaya, Francine Halberg, Yoshihiko Watanabe, Othild Schwartzkopff, Kuniaki Otsuka, Roberto Tarquini, Perfetto Frederico, Jarmila Siggelova

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

95 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A few puzzles relating to a small fraction of my endeavors in the 1950s are summarized herein, with answers to a few questions of the Editor-in-Chief, to suggest that the rules of variability in time complement the rules of genetics as a biological variability in space. I advocate to replace truisms such as a relative constancy or homeostasis, that have served bioscience very well for very long. They were never intended, however, to lower a curtain of ignorance over everyday physiology. In raising these curtains, we unveil a range of dynamics, resolvable in the data collection and as-one-goes analysis by computers built into smaller and smaller devices, for a continued self-surveillance of the normal and for an individualized detection of the abnormal. The current medical art based on spotchecks interpreted by reference to a time-unqualified normal range can become a science of time series with tests relating to the individual in inferential statistical terms. This is already doable for the case of blood pressure, but eventually should become possible for many other variables interpreted today only based on the quicksand of clinical trials on groups. These ignore individual differences and hence the individual's needs. Chronomics (mapping time structures) with the major aim of quantifying normalcy by dynamic reference values for detecting earliest risk elevation, also yields the dividend of allowing molecular biology to focus on the normal as well as on the grossly abnormal.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number2
JournalJournal of Circadian Rhythms
Volume1
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 29 2003

Fingerprint

Reference Values
Art
Individuality
Molecular Biology
Homeostasis
Clinical Trials
Blood Pressure
Equipment and Supplies

Cite this

Halberg, F., Cornelissen-Guillaume, G. G., Katinas, G., Syutkina, E. V., Sothern, R. B., Zaslavskaya, R., ... Siggelova, J. (2003). Transdisciplinary unifying implications of circadian findings in the 1950s. Journal of Circadian Rhythms, 1, [2]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1740-3391-1-2

Transdisciplinary unifying implications of circadian findings in the 1950s. / Halberg, Franz; Cornelissen-Guillaume, Germaine G; Katinas, George; Syutkina, Elena V.; Sothern, Robert B.; Zaslavskaya, Rina; Halberg, Francine; Watanabe, Yoshihiko; Schwartzkopff, Othild; Otsuka, Kuniaki; Tarquini, Roberto; Frederico, Perfetto; Siggelova, Jarmila.

In: Journal of Circadian Rhythms, Vol. 1, 2, 29.10.2003.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Halberg, F, Cornelissen-Guillaume, GG, Katinas, G, Syutkina, EV, Sothern, RB, Zaslavskaya, R, Halberg, F, Watanabe, Y, Schwartzkopff, O, Otsuka, K, Tarquini, R, Frederico, P & Siggelova, J 2003, 'Transdisciplinary unifying implications of circadian findings in the 1950s', Journal of Circadian Rhythms, vol. 1, 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1740-3391-1-2
Halberg, Franz ; Cornelissen-Guillaume, Germaine G ; Katinas, George ; Syutkina, Elena V. ; Sothern, Robert B. ; Zaslavskaya, Rina ; Halberg, Francine ; Watanabe, Yoshihiko ; Schwartzkopff, Othild ; Otsuka, Kuniaki ; Tarquini, Roberto ; Frederico, Perfetto ; Siggelova, Jarmila. / Transdisciplinary unifying implications of circadian findings in the 1950s. In: Journal of Circadian Rhythms. 2003 ; Vol. 1.
@article{58c16ef5cf9d438bbeb964a5e9303cfb,
title = "Transdisciplinary unifying implications of circadian findings in the 1950s",
abstract = "A few puzzles relating to a small fraction of my endeavors in the 1950s are summarized herein, with answers to a few questions of the Editor-in-Chief, to suggest that the rules of variability in time complement the rules of genetics as a biological variability in space. I advocate to replace truisms such as a relative constancy or homeostasis, that have served bioscience very well for very long. They were never intended, however, to lower a curtain of ignorance over everyday physiology. In raising these curtains, we unveil a range of dynamics, resolvable in the data collection and as-one-goes analysis by computers built into smaller and smaller devices, for a continued self-surveillance of the normal and for an individualized detection of the abnormal. The current medical art based on spotchecks interpreted by reference to a time-unqualified normal range can become a science of time series with tests relating to the individual in inferential statistical terms. This is already doable for the case of blood pressure, but eventually should become possible for many other variables interpreted today only based on the quicksand of clinical trials on groups. These ignore individual differences and hence the individual's needs. Chronomics (mapping time structures) with the major aim of quantifying normalcy by dynamic reference values for detecting earliest risk elevation, also yields the dividend of allowing molecular biology to focus on the normal as well as on the grossly abnormal.",
author = "Franz Halberg and Cornelissen-Guillaume, {Germaine G} and George Katinas and Syutkina, {Elena V.} and Sothern, {Robert B.} and Rina Zaslavskaya and Francine Halberg and Yoshihiko Watanabe and Othild Schwartzkopff and Kuniaki Otsuka and Roberto Tarquini and Perfetto Frederico and Jarmila Siggelova",
year = "2003",
month = "10",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1186/1740-3391-1-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
journal = "Journal of Circadian Rhythms",
issn = "1740-3391",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transdisciplinary unifying implications of circadian findings in the 1950s

AU - Halberg, Franz

AU - Cornelissen-Guillaume, Germaine G

AU - Katinas, George

AU - Syutkina, Elena V.

AU - Sothern, Robert B.

AU - Zaslavskaya, Rina

AU - Halberg, Francine

AU - Watanabe, Yoshihiko

AU - Schwartzkopff, Othild

AU - Otsuka, Kuniaki

AU - Tarquini, Roberto

AU - Frederico, Perfetto

AU - Siggelova, Jarmila

PY - 2003/10/29

Y1 - 2003/10/29

N2 - A few puzzles relating to a small fraction of my endeavors in the 1950s are summarized herein, with answers to a few questions of the Editor-in-Chief, to suggest that the rules of variability in time complement the rules of genetics as a biological variability in space. I advocate to replace truisms such as a relative constancy or homeostasis, that have served bioscience very well for very long. They were never intended, however, to lower a curtain of ignorance over everyday physiology. In raising these curtains, we unveil a range of dynamics, resolvable in the data collection and as-one-goes analysis by computers built into smaller and smaller devices, for a continued self-surveillance of the normal and for an individualized detection of the abnormal. The current medical art based on spotchecks interpreted by reference to a time-unqualified normal range can become a science of time series with tests relating to the individual in inferential statistical terms. This is already doable for the case of blood pressure, but eventually should become possible for many other variables interpreted today only based on the quicksand of clinical trials on groups. These ignore individual differences and hence the individual's needs. Chronomics (mapping time structures) with the major aim of quantifying normalcy by dynamic reference values for detecting earliest risk elevation, also yields the dividend of allowing molecular biology to focus on the normal as well as on the grossly abnormal.

AB - A few puzzles relating to a small fraction of my endeavors in the 1950s are summarized herein, with answers to a few questions of the Editor-in-Chief, to suggest that the rules of variability in time complement the rules of genetics as a biological variability in space. I advocate to replace truisms such as a relative constancy or homeostasis, that have served bioscience very well for very long. They were never intended, however, to lower a curtain of ignorance over everyday physiology. In raising these curtains, we unveil a range of dynamics, resolvable in the data collection and as-one-goes analysis by computers built into smaller and smaller devices, for a continued self-surveillance of the normal and for an individualized detection of the abnormal. The current medical art based on spotchecks interpreted by reference to a time-unqualified normal range can become a science of time series with tests relating to the individual in inferential statistical terms. This is already doable for the case of blood pressure, but eventually should become possible for many other variables interpreted today only based on the quicksand of clinical trials on groups. These ignore individual differences and hence the individual's needs. Chronomics (mapping time structures) with the major aim of quantifying normalcy by dynamic reference values for detecting earliest risk elevation, also yields the dividend of allowing molecular biology to focus on the normal as well as on the grossly abnormal.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4243055912&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4243055912&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1740-3391-1-2

DO - 10.1186/1740-3391-1-2

M3 - Review article

VL - 1

JO - Journal of Circadian Rhythms

JF - Journal of Circadian Rhythms

SN - 1740-3391

M1 - 2

ER -