Trace DNA from insect skins

A comparison of five extraction protocols and direct PCR on chironomid pupal exuviae

Petra Kranzfelder, Torbjørn Ekrem, Elisabeth Stur

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Insect skins (exuviae) are of extracellular origin and shed during moulting. The skins do not contain cells or DNA themselves, but epithelial cells and other cell-based structures might accidentally attach as they are shed. This source of trace DNA can be sufficient for PCR amplification and sequencing of target genes and aid in species identification through DNA barcoding or association of unknown life stages. Species identification is essential for biomonitoring programs, as species vary in sensitivities to environmental factors. However, it requires a DNA isolation protocol that optimizes the output of target DNA. Here, we compare the relative effectiveness of five different DNA extraction protocols and direct PCR in isolation of DNA from chironomid pupal exuviae. Chironomidae (Diptera) is a species-rich group of aquatic macroinvertebrates widely distributed in freshwater environments and considered a valuable bioindicator of water quality. Genomic DNA was extracted from 61.2% of 570 sampled pupal exuviae. There were significant differences in the methods with regard to cost, handling time, DNA quantity, PCR success, sequence success and the ability to sequence target taxa. The NucleoSpin® Tissue XS Kit, DNeasy® Blood and Tissue kit, and QuickExtract DNA Extraction Solution provided the best results in isolating DNA from single pupal exuviae. Direct PCR and DTAB/CTAB methods gave poor results. While the observed differences in DNA isolation methods on trace DNA will be relevant to research that focuses on aquatic macroinvertebrate ecology, taxonomy and systematics, they should also be of interest for studies using environmental barcoding and metabarcoding of aquatic environments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)353-363
Number of pages11
JournalMolecular Ecology Resources
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

integument
Chironomidae
skin (animal)
Insects
skin
insect
DNA
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Skin
insects
aquatic invertebrates
comparison
protocol
macroinvertebrate
Hydrobiology
taxonomy
Molting
handling time
barcoding
sheds

Keywords

  • Aquatic macroinvertebrates
  • Biodiversity assessment
  • COI
  • DNA barcoding
  • DNA isolation
  • Species identification

Cite this

Trace DNA from insect skins : A comparison of five extraction protocols and direct PCR on chironomid pupal exuviae. / Kranzfelder, Petra; Ekrem, Torbjørn; Stur, Elisabeth.

In: Molecular Ecology Resources, Vol. 16, No. 1, 01.01.2016, p. 353-363.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kranzfelder, Petra ; Ekrem, Torbjørn ; Stur, Elisabeth. / Trace DNA from insect skins : A comparison of five extraction protocols and direct PCR on chironomid pupal exuviae. In: Molecular Ecology Resources. 2016 ; Vol. 16, No. 1. pp. 353-363.
@article{1ab46f4ac7244b83a776f80c91f5ec7b,
title = "Trace DNA from insect skins: A comparison of five extraction protocols and direct PCR on chironomid pupal exuviae",
abstract = "Insect skins (exuviae) are of extracellular origin and shed during moulting. The skins do not contain cells or DNA themselves, but epithelial cells and other cell-based structures might accidentally attach as they are shed. This source of trace DNA can be sufficient for PCR amplification and sequencing of target genes and aid in species identification through DNA barcoding or association of unknown life stages. Species identification is essential for biomonitoring programs, as species vary in sensitivities to environmental factors. However, it requires a DNA isolation protocol that optimizes the output of target DNA. Here, we compare the relative effectiveness of five different DNA extraction protocols and direct PCR in isolation of DNA from chironomid pupal exuviae. Chironomidae (Diptera) is a species-rich group of aquatic macroinvertebrates widely distributed in freshwater environments and considered a valuable bioindicator of water quality. Genomic DNA was extracted from 61.2{\%} of 570 sampled pupal exuviae. There were significant differences in the methods with regard to cost, handling time, DNA quantity, PCR success, sequence success and the ability to sequence target taxa. The NucleoSpin{\circledR} Tissue XS Kit, DNeasy{\circledR} Blood and Tissue kit, and QuickExtract™ DNA Extraction Solution provided the best results in isolating DNA from single pupal exuviae. Direct PCR and DTAB/CTAB methods gave poor results. While the observed differences in DNA isolation methods on trace DNA will be relevant to research that focuses on aquatic macroinvertebrate ecology, taxonomy and systematics, they should also be of interest for studies using environmental barcoding and metabarcoding of aquatic environments.",
keywords = "Aquatic macroinvertebrates, Biodiversity assessment, COI, DNA barcoding, DNA isolation, Species identification",
author = "Petra Kranzfelder and Torbj{\o}rn Ekrem and Elisabeth Stur",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1755-0998.12446",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "353--363",
journal = "Molecular Ecology Resources",
issn = "1755-098X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trace DNA from insect skins

T2 - A comparison of five extraction protocols and direct PCR on chironomid pupal exuviae

AU - Kranzfelder, Petra

AU - Ekrem, Torbjørn

AU - Stur, Elisabeth

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Insect skins (exuviae) are of extracellular origin and shed during moulting. The skins do not contain cells or DNA themselves, but epithelial cells and other cell-based structures might accidentally attach as they are shed. This source of trace DNA can be sufficient for PCR amplification and sequencing of target genes and aid in species identification through DNA barcoding or association of unknown life stages. Species identification is essential for biomonitoring programs, as species vary in sensitivities to environmental factors. However, it requires a DNA isolation protocol that optimizes the output of target DNA. Here, we compare the relative effectiveness of five different DNA extraction protocols and direct PCR in isolation of DNA from chironomid pupal exuviae. Chironomidae (Diptera) is a species-rich group of aquatic macroinvertebrates widely distributed in freshwater environments and considered a valuable bioindicator of water quality. Genomic DNA was extracted from 61.2% of 570 sampled pupal exuviae. There were significant differences in the methods with regard to cost, handling time, DNA quantity, PCR success, sequence success and the ability to sequence target taxa. The NucleoSpin® Tissue XS Kit, DNeasy® Blood and Tissue kit, and QuickExtract™ DNA Extraction Solution provided the best results in isolating DNA from single pupal exuviae. Direct PCR and DTAB/CTAB methods gave poor results. While the observed differences in DNA isolation methods on trace DNA will be relevant to research that focuses on aquatic macroinvertebrate ecology, taxonomy and systematics, they should also be of interest for studies using environmental barcoding and metabarcoding of aquatic environments.

AB - Insect skins (exuviae) are of extracellular origin and shed during moulting. The skins do not contain cells or DNA themselves, but epithelial cells and other cell-based structures might accidentally attach as they are shed. This source of trace DNA can be sufficient for PCR amplification and sequencing of target genes and aid in species identification through DNA barcoding or association of unknown life stages. Species identification is essential for biomonitoring programs, as species vary in sensitivities to environmental factors. However, it requires a DNA isolation protocol that optimizes the output of target DNA. Here, we compare the relative effectiveness of five different DNA extraction protocols and direct PCR in isolation of DNA from chironomid pupal exuviae. Chironomidae (Diptera) is a species-rich group of aquatic macroinvertebrates widely distributed in freshwater environments and considered a valuable bioindicator of water quality. Genomic DNA was extracted from 61.2% of 570 sampled pupal exuviae. There were significant differences in the methods with regard to cost, handling time, DNA quantity, PCR success, sequence success and the ability to sequence target taxa. The NucleoSpin® Tissue XS Kit, DNeasy® Blood and Tissue kit, and QuickExtract™ DNA Extraction Solution provided the best results in isolating DNA from single pupal exuviae. Direct PCR and DTAB/CTAB methods gave poor results. While the observed differences in DNA isolation methods on trace DNA will be relevant to research that focuses on aquatic macroinvertebrate ecology, taxonomy and systematics, they should also be of interest for studies using environmental barcoding and metabarcoding of aquatic environments.

KW - Aquatic macroinvertebrates

KW - Biodiversity assessment

KW - COI

KW - DNA barcoding

KW - DNA isolation

KW - Species identification

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955210566&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955210566&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1755-0998.12446

DO - 10.1111/1755-0998.12446

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 353

EP - 363

JO - Molecular Ecology Resources

JF - Molecular Ecology Resources

SN - 1755-098X

IS - 1

ER -