Toward a taxonomy of essential evaluator competencies

Jean A King, Laurie Stevahn, Gail Ghere, Jane Minnema

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

67 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article discusses an exploratory study designed to determine the extent to which evaluation professionals, representing diverse backgrounds and approaches, could reach agreement on a proposed taxonomy of essential evaluator competencies. Participants were 31 diverse individuals in the field of program evaluation in the greater Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota area who systematically engaged in a Multi-Attribute Consensus Reaching process. Both quantitative and qualitative results predominantly indicated consensus on more than three-fourths of the proposed competencies. Areas of disagreement reflected the role- and context-specific nature of evaluation practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)229-247
Number of pages19
JournalAmerican Journal of Evaluation
Volume22
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Toward a taxonomy of essential evaluator competencies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this