Abstract
Conducted a field experiment to test the self-perception explanation of the "foot-in-the-door" phenomenon of increased compliance with a substantial request after prior compliance with a smaller demand. In this study, 30 Ss were first approached with a small request (answer 8 questions in a telephone survey) the size of which was virtually certain to guarantee compliance. 32 other Ss were first approached with a request sufficiently large to guarantee noncompliance (answer 50 questions). Ss in both of these conditions were subsequently approached with a moderately sized request (30 questions sponsored by a different public service organization). As predicted by self-perception theory, Ss in the small-initial-request condition showed a higher rate of compliance to the 2nd request (.519), whereas Ss in the large-initial-request condition showed a lower rate of compliance (.219) than Ss in the no-initial-request control condition (.333). (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 64-67 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Journal of personality and social psychology |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1975 |
Keywords
- compliance vs noncompliance, compliance with 2nd request, test of self-perception theory of "foot-in-the-door" phenomena
- large vs small initial request &
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'To comply or not comply: Testing the self-perception explanation of the "foot-in-the-door" phenomenon'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS