TY - JOUR
T1 - To comply or not comply
T2 - Testing the self-perception explanation of the "foot-in-the-door" phenomenon
AU - Snyder, Mark
AU - Cunningham, Michael R.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2009 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 1975/1
Y1 - 1975/1
N2 - Conducted a field experiment to test the self-perception explanation of the "foot-in-the-door" phenomenon of increased compliance with a substantial request after prior compliance with a smaller demand. In this study, 30 Ss were first approached with a small request (answer 8 questions in a telephone survey) the size of which was virtually certain to guarantee compliance. 32 other Ss were first approached with a request sufficiently large to guarantee noncompliance (answer 50 questions). Ss in both of these conditions were subsequently approached with a moderately sized request (30 questions sponsored by a different public service organization). As predicted by self-perception theory, Ss in the small-initial-request condition showed a higher rate of compliance to the 2nd request (.519), whereas Ss in the large-initial-request condition showed a lower rate of compliance (.219) than Ss in the no-initial-request control condition (.333). (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).
AB - Conducted a field experiment to test the self-perception explanation of the "foot-in-the-door" phenomenon of increased compliance with a substantial request after prior compliance with a smaller demand. In this study, 30 Ss were first approached with a small request (answer 8 questions in a telephone survey) the size of which was virtually certain to guarantee compliance. 32 other Ss were first approached with a request sufficiently large to guarantee noncompliance (answer 50 questions). Ss in both of these conditions were subsequently approached with a moderately sized request (30 questions sponsored by a different public service organization). As predicted by self-perception theory, Ss in the small-initial-request condition showed a higher rate of compliance to the 2nd request (.519), whereas Ss in the large-initial-request condition showed a lower rate of compliance (.219) than Ss in the no-initial-request control condition (.333). (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).
KW - compliance vs noncompliance, compliance with 2nd request, test of self-perception theory of "foot-in-the-door" phenomena
KW - large vs small initial request &
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0016413315&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0016413315&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/h0076245
DO - 10.1037/h0076245
M3 - Article
C2 - 1117412
AN - SCOPUS:0016413315
SN - 0022-3514
VL - 31
SP - 64
EP - 67
JO - Journal of personality and social psychology
JF - Journal of personality and social psychology
IS - 1
ER -