Abstract
Attention can facilitate visual processing, emphasizing specific locations and highlighting stimuli containing specific features. To dissociate the mechanisms of spatial and feature-based attention, we compared the time course of visually evoked responses under different attention conditions. We recorded from single neurons in area V4 during a delayed match-to-sample task that controlled both spatial and feature-based attention. Neuronal responses increased when spatial attention was directed toward the receptive field and were modulated by the identity of the target of feature-based attention. Modulation by spatial attention was weaker during the early portion of the visual response and stronger during the later portion of the response. In contrast, modulation by feature-based attention was relatively constant throughout the response. It appears that stimulus onset transients disrupt spatial attention, but not feature attention. We conclude that spatial attention reflects a combination of stimulus-driven and goal-driven processes, while feature-based attention is purely goal driven.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 637-643 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Neuron |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 1 2005 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This work was supported by grants to J.L.G. from the NEI and NIMH. We thank James Mazer for development of the neurophysiology software suite; and James Mazer, Stephen David, and Kate Gustavsen for advice on experimental design and data analysis.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Time course of attention reveals different mechanisms for spatial and feature-based attention in area V4'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS