Abstract
Three theories of egocentric speech are contrasted. Alternative predictions of the same phenomenon by the theories of Piaget, Vygotsky and a prototheoretical position associated with Mead, Flavell and Wilder are subjected to empirical evaluation. The Mead-Flavell-Wilder prototheory proved to be the most predictive. Weaknesses in its explanatory power are explored. Some assumptions remain to be tested before the contrast is complete.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 18-32 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Communication Monographs |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 1978 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Three theories of egocentric speech: A contrastive analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS