Abstract
Multiple-choice items are a mainstay of achievement testing. The need to adequately cover the content domain to certify achievement proficiency by producing meaningful precise scores requires many high-quality items. More 3-option items can be administered than 4- or 5-option items per testing time while improving content coverage, without detrimental effects on psychometric quality of test scores. Researchers have endorsed 3-option items for over 80 years with empirical evidence - the results of which have been synthesized in an effort to unify this endorsement and encourage its adoption.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 3-13 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 1 2005 |
Keywords
- Item analysis
- Item writing
- Meta-analysis
- Multiple choice
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Three options are optimal for multiple-choice items: A meta-analysis of 80 years of research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS