Abstract
INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to 3-dimensionally quantify and compare the outcomes of growing patients with Class II malocclusion treated with the cervical pull face-bow headgear appliance in combination with full fixed orthodontic appliances.
METHODS: The study sample consisted of 22 patients with Class II malocclusion with the following inclusion criteria: ANB >4.75°, Class II molar relationship, and SN-GoGn <37°. The mean age of patients was 12.5 ± 1.1 years at baseline. The average treatment time was 27.7 ± 7.3 months. Cone-beam computed tomography scans were superimposed in the cranial base, maxillary regional, and mandibular regional to evaluate growth, treatment displacements, and bone remodeling.
RESULTS: Relevant statistically and clinically significant skeletal changes included average decreases in ANB (2.1 ± 1.1°) and SNA (1.8 ± 1.1°); posterior (1.3 ± 1.4 mm) and inferior (4.6 ± 2.2 mm) displacement of A-point; inferior displacements of B-point (5.4 ± 2.8 mm) and Pogonion (5.8 ± 2.6 mm); superior displacement of Condylion (6.9 ± 2.4 mm); increase in mandibular length (5.4 ± 2.0 mm); and clockwise rotation of palatal plane (1.9 ± 1.9°). Significant proclination of the maxillary incisors (9.8 ± 11.1°) and nonsignificant proclination of the mandibular incisors (4.7 ± 9.6°) were also noted.
CONCLUSIONS: Class II skeletal correction was primarily achieved by posterior, inferior displacement of the sagittal position of the maxilla. Change in the sagittal position of the mandible/chin (B-point, Pogonion) was not significant; rather, mandibular displacement was significant in an inferior vertical direction without backward rotation, as seen from marked condylar and ramus growth.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 491-501 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics |
| Volume | 162 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:The first author thanks their research committee and mentors listed as coauthors for this manuscript; the University of Minnesota Graduate Orthodontics residents and faculty; their University of Michigan co-residents and faculty; their beautiful wife, Kathryn; and their dog-hter, Roux, for their continued support in the accomplishment of this study. Supported by NIDCR DE024450.
Funding Information:
Supported by NIDCR DE024450.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American Association of Orthodontists
Keywords
- Adolescent
- Cephalometry/methods
- Child
- Extraoral Traction Appliances
- Humans
- Malocclusion, Angle Class II/diagnostic imaging
- Mandible/diagnostic imaging
- Maxilla/diagnostic imaging
- Technology
PubMed: MeSH publication types
- Journal Article
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Three-dimensional cone-beam computed technology evaluation of skeletal and dental changes in growing patients with Class II malocclusion treated with the cervical pull face-bow headgear appliance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS