Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
Experts@Minnesota Home
Home
Profiles
Research units
University Assets
Projects and Grants
Research output
Datasets
Press/Media
Activities
Fellowships, Honors, and Prizes
Impacts
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
Theta and delta band activity explain N2 and P3 ERP component activity in a go/no-go task
Jeremy Harper
,
Stephen M. Malone
, Edward M. Bernat
Psychology (Twin Cities)
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Article
›
peer-review
183
Scopus citations
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Theta and delta band activity explain N2 and P3 ERP component activity in a go/no-go task'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Nogo-A
100%
P3 Component
100%
Component Activities
100%
ERP Components
100%
Delta Band Activity
100%
Theta Band Activity
100%
N2 ERP
100%
P3 ERP
100%
Delta Measure on Time Scales
100%
N2 Component
75%
Response Inhibition
50%
Gambling
25%
Standard Time
25%
Time-frequency
25%
Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA)
25%
Theta Band
25%
Decomposition Approach
25%
Theta Frequency
25%
EEG Signals
25%
Delta Band
25%
Separable Processes
25%
Feedback-related Negativity
25%
Functional Processes
25%
Feedback P3
25%
Delta Frequency Band
25%
Domain Component
25%
Psychology
Response Inhibition
100%
Gambling
50%
Principal Component Analysis
50%
Task Feedback
50%