The weight of the flood-of-record in flood frequency analysis

Scott St. George, Manfred Mudelsee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The standard approach to flood frequency analysis (FFA) fits mathematical functions to sequences of historic flood data and extrapolates the tails of the distribution to estimate the magnitude and likelihood of extreme floods. Here, we identify the most exceptional floods in the United States as compared against other major floods at the same location, and evaluate how the flood-of-record (Qmax) influences FFA estimates. On average, floods-of-record are 20% larger by discharge than their second-place counterparts (Q2), and 212 gages (7.3%) have Qmax:Q2 ratios greater than two. There is no clear correspondence between the Qmax:Q2 ratio and median instantaneous discharge, and exceptional floods do not become less likely with time. Excluding Qmax from the FFA causes the median 100-year flood to decline by −10.5%, the 200-year flood by −11.8%, and the 500-year flood by −13.4%. Even when floods are modelled using a heavy tail distribution, the removal of Qmax yields significantly “lighter” tails and underestimates the risk of large floods. Despite the temporal extension of systematic hydrological observations in the United States, FFA is still sensitive to the presence of extreme events within the sample used to calculate the frequency curve.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere12512
JournalJournal of Flood Risk Management
Volume12
Issue numberS1
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2019

Fingerprint

frequency analysis
flood frequency
natural disaster
extreme event
gauge

Keywords

  • United States
  • flood frequency analysis
  • floods
  • heavy tail analysis
  • record floods

Cite this

The weight of the flood-of-record in flood frequency analysis. / St. George, Scott; Mudelsee, Manfred.

In: Journal of Flood Risk Management, Vol. 12, No. S1, e12512, 01.10.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6dc81497a393404481b10913d1a45bed,
title = "The weight of the flood-of-record in flood frequency analysis",
abstract = "The standard approach to flood frequency analysis (FFA) fits mathematical functions to sequences of historic flood data and extrapolates the tails of the distribution to estimate the magnitude and likelihood of extreme floods. Here, we identify the most exceptional floods in the United States as compared against other major floods at the same location, and evaluate how the flood-of-record (Qmax) influences FFA estimates. On average, floods-of-record are 20{\%} larger by discharge than their second-place counterparts (Q2), and 212 gages (7.3{\%}) have Qmax:Q2 ratios greater than two. There is no clear correspondence between the Qmax:Q2 ratio and median instantaneous discharge, and exceptional floods do not become less likely with time. Excluding Qmax from the FFA causes the median 100-year flood to decline by −10.5{\%}, the 200-year flood by −11.8{\%}, and the 500-year flood by −13.4{\%}. Even when floods are modelled using a heavy tail distribution, the removal of Qmax yields significantly “lighter” tails and underestimates the risk of large floods. Despite the temporal extension of systematic hydrological observations in the United States, FFA is still sensitive to the presence of extreme events within the sample used to calculate the frequency curve.",
keywords = "United States, flood frequency analysis, floods, heavy tail analysis, record floods",
author = "{St. George}, Scott and Manfred Mudelsee",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jfr3.12512",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
journal = "Journal of Flood Risk Management",
issn = "1753-318X",
publisher = "Blackwell Publishing",
number = "S1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The weight of the flood-of-record in flood frequency analysis

AU - St. George, Scott

AU - Mudelsee, Manfred

PY - 2019/10/1

Y1 - 2019/10/1

N2 - The standard approach to flood frequency analysis (FFA) fits mathematical functions to sequences of historic flood data and extrapolates the tails of the distribution to estimate the magnitude and likelihood of extreme floods. Here, we identify the most exceptional floods in the United States as compared against other major floods at the same location, and evaluate how the flood-of-record (Qmax) influences FFA estimates. On average, floods-of-record are 20% larger by discharge than their second-place counterparts (Q2), and 212 gages (7.3%) have Qmax:Q2 ratios greater than two. There is no clear correspondence between the Qmax:Q2 ratio and median instantaneous discharge, and exceptional floods do not become less likely with time. Excluding Qmax from the FFA causes the median 100-year flood to decline by −10.5%, the 200-year flood by −11.8%, and the 500-year flood by −13.4%. Even when floods are modelled using a heavy tail distribution, the removal of Qmax yields significantly “lighter” tails and underestimates the risk of large floods. Despite the temporal extension of systematic hydrological observations in the United States, FFA is still sensitive to the presence of extreme events within the sample used to calculate the frequency curve.

AB - The standard approach to flood frequency analysis (FFA) fits mathematical functions to sequences of historic flood data and extrapolates the tails of the distribution to estimate the magnitude and likelihood of extreme floods. Here, we identify the most exceptional floods in the United States as compared against other major floods at the same location, and evaluate how the flood-of-record (Qmax) influences FFA estimates. On average, floods-of-record are 20% larger by discharge than their second-place counterparts (Q2), and 212 gages (7.3%) have Qmax:Q2 ratios greater than two. There is no clear correspondence between the Qmax:Q2 ratio and median instantaneous discharge, and exceptional floods do not become less likely with time. Excluding Qmax from the FFA causes the median 100-year flood to decline by −10.5%, the 200-year flood by −11.8%, and the 500-year flood by −13.4%. Even when floods are modelled using a heavy tail distribution, the removal of Qmax yields significantly “lighter” tails and underestimates the risk of large floods. Despite the temporal extension of systematic hydrological observations in the United States, FFA is still sensitive to the presence of extreme events within the sample used to calculate the frequency curve.

KW - United States

KW - flood frequency analysis

KW - floods

KW - heavy tail analysis

KW - record floods

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057265112&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057265112&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jfr3.12512

DO - 10.1111/jfr3.12512

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85057265112

VL - 12

JO - Journal of Flood Risk Management

JF - Journal of Flood Risk Management

SN - 1753-318X

IS - S1

M1 - e12512

ER -