The Water Planetary Boundary: Interrogation and Revision

Tom Gleeson; Lan Wang-Erlandsson; Samuel C. Zipper; Miina Porkka; Fernando Jaramillo; Dieter Gerten; Ingo Fetzer; Sarah E. Cornell; Luigi Piemontese; Line J. Gordon; Johan Rockström; Taikan Oki; Murugesu Sivapalan; Yoshihide Wada; Kate A. Brauman; Martina Flörke; Marc F.P. Bierkens; Bernhard Lehner; Patrick Keys; Matti Kummu; Thorsten Wagener; Simon Dadson; Tara J. Troy; Will Steffen; Malin Falkenmark; James S. Famiglietti

doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2020.02.009

The Water Planetary Boundary: Interrogation and Revision

Tom Gleeson, Lan Wang-Erlandsson, Samuel C. Zipper, Miina Porkka, Fernando Jaramillo, Dieter Gerten, Ingo Fetzer, Sarah E. Cornell, Luigi Piemontese, Line J. Gordon, Johan Rockström, Taikan Oki, Murugesu Sivapalan, Yoshihide Wada, Kate A. Brauman, Martina Flörke, Marc F.P. Bierkens, Bernhard Lehner, Patrick Keys, Matti KummuThorsten Wagener, Simon Dadson, Tara J. Troy, Will Steffen, Malin Falkenmark, James S. Famiglietti

Institute on the Environment

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

118 Scopus citations

Abstract

The planetary boundaries framework proposes quantified guardrails to human modification of global environmental processes that regulate the stability of the planet and has been considered in sustainability science, governance, and corporate management. However, the planetary boundary for human freshwater use has been critiqued as a singular measure that does not reflect all types of human interference with the complex global water cycle and Earth System. We suggest that the water planetary boundary will be more scientifically robust and more useful in decision-making frameworks if it is redesigned to consider more specifically how climate and living ecosystems respond to changes in the different forms of water on Earth: atmospheric water, frozen water, groundwater, soil moisture, and surface water. This paper provides an ambitious scientific road map to define a new water planetary boundary consisting of sub-boundaries that account for a variety of changes to the water cycle.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	223-234
Number of pages	12
Journal	One Earth
Volume	2
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.02.009
State	Published - Mar 20 2020

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This community project was directly supported by an internationalization grant to T.G. and I.F. from the Swedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education. L.W.-E. and L.J.G. acknowledge support from Formas—a Swedish research council for sustainable development (Project Ripples of Resilience, 2018-02345). L.W.-E., I.F., S.E.C., and J.R. acknowledge the European Research Council under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme grant agreement (Project Earth Resilience in the Anthropocene, ERC-2016-ADG 743080 ). L.W.-E. acknowledges the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science postdoctoral fellowship ( P-17761 ). M.P. acknowledges support from the Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University (Research Area 7). The participation of F.J. was funded by the Swedish Research Council (VR, project 2015-06503) and the Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning FORMAS ( 942-2015-740 ). M.K. is funded by European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement no. 819202 ). We thank many members of the community who contributed to the discussions.

Funding Information:
This community project was directly supported by an internationalization grant to T.G. and I.F. from the Swedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education. L.W.-E. and L.J.G. acknowledge support from Formas?a Swedish research council for sustainable development (Project Ripples of Resilience, 2018-02345). L.W.-E. I.F. S.E.C. and J.R. acknowledge the European Research Council under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme grant agreement (Project Earth Resilience in the Anthropocene, ERC-2016-ADG 743080). L.W.-E. acknowledges the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science postdoctoral fellowship (P-17761). M.P. acknowledges support from the Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University (Research Area 7). The participation of F.J. was funded by the Swedish Research Council (VR, project 2015-06503) and the Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning FORMAS (942-2015-740). M.K. is funded by European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement no. 819202). We thank many members of the community who contributed to the discussions. Conceptualization, Methodology, and Writing ? Original Draft, T.G. L.W.-E. S.C.Z. M.P. F.J. D.G. and I.F.; Writing ? Review and Editing, all authors. T.G. is a scientific advisor for Foundry Spatial Ltd.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors

Keywords

Earth System
environmental flows
moisture recycling
planetary boundary
resource management
sustainability
water cycle
water governance
water resources

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Publisher link

10.1016/j.oneear.2020.02.009

Find It

Find It at U of M Libraries

Cite this

Gleeson, T., Wang-Erlandsson, L., Zipper, S. C., Porkka, M., Jaramillo, F., Gerten, D., Fetzer, I., Cornell, S. E., Piemontese, L., Gordon, L. J., Rockström, J., Oki, T., Sivapalan, M., Wada, Y., Brauman, K. A., Flörke, M., Bierkens, M. F. P., Lehner, B., Keys, P., ... Famiglietti, J. S. (2020). The Water Planetary Boundary: Interrogation and Revision. One Earth, 2(3), 223-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.02.009

Gleeson, T, Wang-Erlandsson, L, Zipper, SC, Porkka, M, Jaramillo, F, Gerten, D, Fetzer, I, Cornell, SE, Piemontese, L, Gordon, LJ, Rockström, J, Oki, T, Sivapalan, M, Wada, Y, Brauman, KA, Flörke, M, Bierkens, MFP, Lehner, B, Keys, P, Kummu, M, Wagener, T, Dadson, S, Troy, TJ, Steffen, W, Falkenmark, M & Famiglietti, JS 2020, 'The Water Planetary Boundary: Interrogation and Revision', One Earth, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 223-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.02.009

@article{c10d142f284045b8844d74a0129254cd,

title = "The Water Planetary Boundary: Interrogation and Revision",

abstract = "The planetary boundaries framework proposes quantified guardrails to human modification of global environmental processes that regulate the stability of the planet and has been considered in sustainability science, governance, and corporate management. However, the planetary boundary for human freshwater use has been critiqued as a singular measure that does not reflect all types of human interference with the complex global water cycle and Earth System. We suggest that the water planetary boundary will be more scientifically robust and more useful in decision-making frameworks if it is redesigned to consider more specifically how climate and living ecosystems respond to changes in the different forms of water on Earth: atmospheric water, frozen water, groundwater, soil moisture, and surface water. This paper provides an ambitious scientific road map to define a new water planetary boundary consisting of sub-boundaries that account for a variety of changes to the water cycle.",

keywords = "Earth System, environmental flows, moisture recycling, planetary boundary, resource management, sustainability, water cycle, water governance, water resources",

author = "Tom Gleeson and Lan Wang-Erlandsson and Zipper, {Samuel C.} and Miina Porkka and Fernando Jaramillo and Dieter Gerten and Ingo Fetzer and Cornell, {Sarah E.} and Luigi Piemontese and Gordon, {Line J.} and Johan Rockstr{\"o}m and Taikan Oki and Murugesu Sivapalan and Yoshihide Wada and Brauman, {Kate A.} and Martina Fl{\"o}rke and Bierkens, {Marc F.P.} and Bernhard Lehner and Patrick Keys and Matti Kummu and Thorsten Wagener and Simon Dadson and Troy, {Tara J.} and Will Steffen and Malin Falkenmark and Famiglietti, {James S.}",

note = "Funding Information: This community project was directly supported by an internationalization grant to T.G. and I.F. from the Swedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education. L.W.-E. and L.J.G. acknowledge support from Formas—a Swedish research council for sustainable development (Project Ripples of Resilience, 2018-02345). L.W.-E., I.F., S.E.C., and J.R. acknowledge the European Research Council under the European Union{\textquoteright}s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme grant agreement (Project Earth Resilience in the Anthropocene, ERC-2016-ADG 743080 ). L.W.-E. acknowledges the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science postdoctoral fellowship ( P-17761 ). M.P. acknowledges support from the Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University (Research Area 7). The participation of F.J. was funded by the Swedish Research Council (VR, project 2015-06503) and the Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning FORMAS ( 942-2015-740 ). M.K. is funded by European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union{\textquoteright}s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement no. 819202 ). We thank many members of the community who contributed to the discussions. Funding Information: This community project was directly supported by an internationalization grant to T.G. and I.F. from the Swedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education. L.W.-E. and L.J.G. acknowledge support from Formas?a Swedish research council for sustainable development (Project Ripples of Resilience, 2018-02345). L.W.-E. I.F. S.E.C. and J.R. acknowledge the European Research Council under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme grant agreement (Project Earth Resilience in the Anthropocene, ERC-2016-ADG 743080). L.W.-E. acknowledges the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science postdoctoral fellowship (P-17761). M.P. acknowledges support from the Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University (Research Area 7). The participation of F.J. was funded by the Swedish Research Council (VR, project 2015-06503) and the Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning FORMAS (942-2015-740). M.K. is funded by European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement no. 819202). We thank many members of the community who contributed to the discussions. Conceptualization, Methodology, and Writing ? Original Draft, T.G. L.W.-E. S.C.Z. M.P. F.J. D.G. and I.F.; Writing ? Review and Editing, all authors. T.G. is a scientific advisor for Foundry Spatial Ltd. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 The Authors",

year = "2020",

month = mar,

day = "20",

doi = "10.1016/j.oneear.2020.02.009",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "2",

pages = "223--234",

journal = "One Earth",

issn = "2590-3330",

publisher = "Cell Press",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Water Planetary Boundary

T2 - Interrogation and Revision

AU - Gleeson, Tom

AU - Wang-Erlandsson, Lan

AU - Zipper, Samuel C.

AU - Porkka, Miina

AU - Jaramillo, Fernando

AU - Gerten, Dieter

AU - Fetzer, Ingo

AU - Cornell, Sarah E.

AU - Piemontese, Luigi

AU - Gordon, Line J.

AU - Rockström, Johan

AU - Oki, Taikan

AU - Sivapalan, Murugesu

AU - Wada, Yoshihide

AU - Brauman, Kate A.

AU - Flörke, Martina

AU - Bierkens, Marc F.P.

AU - Lehner, Bernhard

AU - Keys, Patrick

AU - Kummu, Matti

AU - Wagener, Thorsten

AU - Dadson, Simon

AU - Troy, Tara J.

AU - Steffen, Will

AU - Falkenmark, Malin

AU - Famiglietti, James S.

N1 - Funding Information: This community project was directly supported by an internationalization grant to T.G. and I.F. from the Swedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education. L.W.-E. and L.J.G. acknowledge support from Formas—a Swedish research council for sustainable development (Project Ripples of Resilience, 2018-02345). L.W.-E., I.F., S.E.C., and J.R. acknowledge the European Research Council under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme grant agreement (Project Earth Resilience in the Anthropocene, ERC-2016-ADG 743080 ). L.W.-E. acknowledges the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science postdoctoral fellowship ( P-17761 ). M.P. acknowledges support from the Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University (Research Area 7). The participation of F.J. was funded by the Swedish Research Council (VR, project 2015-06503) and the Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning FORMAS ( 942-2015-740 ). M.K. is funded by European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement no. 819202 ). We thank many members of the community who contributed to the discussions. Funding Information: This community project was directly supported by an internationalization grant to T.G. and I.F. from the Swedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education. L.W.-E. and L.J.G. acknowledge support from Formas?a Swedish research council for sustainable development (Project Ripples of Resilience, 2018-02345). L.W.-E. I.F. S.E.C. and J.R. acknowledge the European Research Council under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme grant agreement (Project Earth Resilience in the Anthropocene, ERC-2016-ADG 743080). L.W.-E. acknowledges the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science postdoctoral fellowship (P-17761). M.P. acknowledges support from the Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University (Research Area 7). The participation of F.J. was funded by the Swedish Research Council (VR, project 2015-06503) and the Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning FORMAS (942-2015-740). M.K. is funded by European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement no. 819202). We thank many members of the community who contributed to the discussions. Conceptualization, Methodology, and Writing ? Original Draft, T.G. L.W.-E. S.C.Z. M.P. F.J. D.G. and I.F.; Writing ? Review and Editing, all authors. T.G. is a scientific advisor for Foundry Spatial Ltd. Publisher Copyright: © 2020 The Authors

PY - 2020/3/20

Y1 - 2020/3/20

N2 - The planetary boundaries framework proposes quantified guardrails to human modification of global environmental processes that regulate the stability of the planet and has been considered in sustainability science, governance, and corporate management. However, the planetary boundary for human freshwater use has been critiqued as a singular measure that does not reflect all types of human interference with the complex global water cycle and Earth System. We suggest that the water planetary boundary will be more scientifically robust and more useful in decision-making frameworks if it is redesigned to consider more specifically how climate and living ecosystems respond to changes in the different forms of water on Earth: atmospheric water, frozen water, groundwater, soil moisture, and surface water. This paper provides an ambitious scientific road map to define a new water planetary boundary consisting of sub-boundaries that account for a variety of changes to the water cycle.

AB - The planetary boundaries framework proposes quantified guardrails to human modification of global environmental processes that regulate the stability of the planet and has been considered in sustainability science, governance, and corporate management. However, the planetary boundary for human freshwater use has been critiqued as a singular measure that does not reflect all types of human interference with the complex global water cycle and Earth System. We suggest that the water planetary boundary will be more scientifically robust and more useful in decision-making frameworks if it is redesigned to consider more specifically how climate and living ecosystems respond to changes in the different forms of water on Earth: atmospheric water, frozen water, groundwater, soil moisture, and surface water. This paper provides an ambitious scientific road map to define a new water planetary boundary consisting of sub-boundaries that account for a variety of changes to the water cycle.

KW - Earth System

KW - environmental flows

KW - moisture recycling

KW - planetary boundary

KW - resource management

KW - sustainability

KW - water cycle

KW - water governance

KW - water resources

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85088871553&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85088871553&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.02.009

DO - 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.02.009

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85088871553

SN - 2590-3330

VL - 2

SP - 223

EP - 234

JO - One Earth

JF - One Earth

IS - 3

ER -

The Water Planetary Boundary: Interrogation and Revision

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

UN SDGs

Publisher link

Find It

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this