The urinary diary in evaluation of incontinent women: A test-retest analysis

Jean F. Wyman, Sung C. Choi, Stephen W. Harkins, Mary S. Wilson, J. Andrew Fantl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

253 Scopus citations


This study investigated the use of a one-week urinary diary in the evaluation of incontinent women. The sample consisted of 50 community-dwelling women, ages 55 years and older, ambulatory, and mentally intact, who were volunteers in a clinical trial on behavioral management for urinary incontinence. All subjects kept a urinary diary for two consecutive weeks. An analysis of the immediate (one- week) test-retest variability and correlations on weekly diurnal micturition frequency, nocturnal micturition frequency, and urinary incontinent episodes were performed in subjects with sphincteric incompetence alone (N = 34) and in those with detrusor instability with or without concomitant sphincteric incompetence (N = 16). In addition, information obtained on history was compared with that obtained from the diary. Diurnal micturition frequency, nocturnal micturition frequency, and number of incontinent episodes were highly reproducible and did not differ by urodynamic diagnosis. Test-retest correlations were highest with diurnal micturition frequency and incontinent episodes. Lower correlations were observed with nocturnal micturition frequency, with a significant difference observed between diagnostic groups. Although modest, significant relationships between data collected by history and diary were observed in the overall sample, but there were significant differences between diagnostic groups. The results indicate that a one-week diary is a reliable method for assessing the frequency of voluntary micturitions and involuntary episodes of urine loss.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)812-817
Number of pages6
JournalObstetrics and gynecology
Issue number6
StatePublished - Jun 1988


Dive into the research topics of 'The urinary diary in evaluation of incontinent women: A test-retest analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this