The "Traditional" Indeterminate Sentencing Model

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article discusses the traditional American "indeterminate" sentencing systems, which are still used in approximately half the states in America. It shows that the parole boards hold most of the authority with regards to the lengths of most prison terms. It then summarizes the current knowledge on these systems, and records some of the differences across systems. This article concludes that there is no basis with which to form policy judgments of "worse" or "practices".

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Oxford Handbook of Sentencing and Corrections
EditorsJoan Petersilia, Kevin Reitz
PublisherOxford University Press
ISBN (Electronic)9780199968756
ISBN (Print)9780199730148
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 18 2012

Fingerprint

correctional institution

Keywords

  • Authority
  • Indeterminate sentencing systems
  • Parole boards
  • Prison terms

Cite this

Reitz, K. R. (2012). The "Traditional" Indeterminate Sentencing Model. In J. Petersilia, & K. Reitz (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Sentencing and Corrections Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199730148.013.0011

The "Traditional" Indeterminate Sentencing Model. / Reitz, Kevin R.

The Oxford Handbook of Sentencing and Corrections. ed. / Joan Petersilia; Kevin Reitz. Oxford University Press, 2012.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Reitz, KR 2012, The "Traditional" Indeterminate Sentencing Model. in J Petersilia & K Reitz (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Sentencing and Corrections. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199730148.013.0011
Reitz KR. The "Traditional" Indeterminate Sentencing Model. In Petersilia J, Reitz K, editors, The Oxford Handbook of Sentencing and Corrections. Oxford University Press. 2012 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199730148.013.0011
Reitz, Kevin R. / The "Traditional" Indeterminate Sentencing Model. The Oxford Handbook of Sentencing and Corrections. editor / Joan Petersilia ; Kevin Reitz. Oxford University Press, 2012.
@inbook{1652c1579f4845fb84228008736985aa,
title = "The {"}Traditional{"} Indeterminate Sentencing Model",
abstract = "This article discusses the traditional American {"}indeterminate{"} sentencing systems, which are still used in approximately half the states in America. It shows that the parole boards hold most of the authority with regards to the lengths of most prison terms. It then summarizes the current knowledge on these systems, and records some of the differences across systems. This article concludes that there is no basis with which to form policy judgments of {"}worse{"} or {"}practices{"}.",
keywords = "Authority, Indeterminate sentencing systems, Parole boards, Prison terms",
author = "Reitz, {Kevin R.}",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199730148.013.0011",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780199730148",
editor = "Joan Petersilia and Kevin Reitz",
booktitle = "The Oxford Handbook of Sentencing and Corrections",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - The "Traditional" Indeterminate Sentencing Model

AU - Reitz, Kevin R.

PY - 2012/9/18

Y1 - 2012/9/18

N2 - This article discusses the traditional American "indeterminate" sentencing systems, which are still used in approximately half the states in America. It shows that the parole boards hold most of the authority with regards to the lengths of most prison terms. It then summarizes the current knowledge on these systems, and records some of the differences across systems. This article concludes that there is no basis with which to form policy judgments of "worse" or "practices".

AB - This article discusses the traditional American "indeterminate" sentencing systems, which are still used in approximately half the states in America. It shows that the parole boards hold most of the authority with regards to the lengths of most prison terms. It then summarizes the current knowledge on these systems, and records some of the differences across systems. This article concludes that there is no basis with which to form policy judgments of "worse" or "practices".

KW - Authority

KW - Indeterminate sentencing systems

KW - Parole boards

KW - Prison terms

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924903339&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84924903339&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199730148.013.0011

DO - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199730148.013.0011

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780199730148

BT - The Oxford Handbook of Sentencing and Corrections

A2 - Petersilia, Joan

A2 - Reitz, Kevin

PB - Oxford University Press

ER -