The Teamwork in Assertive Community Treatment (TACT) scale: Development and validation

Douglas R Wholey, Xi Zhu, David H Knoke, Pri P Shah, Mary E Zellmer-Bruhn, Thomas F. Witheridge

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Team design is meticulously specified for assertive community treatment (ACT) teams, yet performance can vary across ACT teams, even those with high fidelity. By developing and validating the Teamwork in Assertive Community Treatment (TACT) scale, investigators examined the role of team processes in ACT performance. Methods: The TACT scale measuring ACT teamwork was developed from a conceptual model grounded in organizational research and adapted for the ACT and mental health context. TACT subscales were constructed after exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. The reliability, discriminant validity, predictive validity, temporal stability, internal consistency, and within-team agreement were established with surveys from approximately 300 members of 26 Minnesota ACT teams who completed the questionnaire three times, at six-month intervals. Results: Nine TACT subscales emerged from the analyses: exploration, exploitation of new and existing knowledge, psychological safety, goal agreement, conflict, constructive controversy, information accessibility, encounter preparedness, and consumer-centered care. These nine subscales demonstrated fit and temporal stability (confirmatory factor analysis), high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), and within-team agreement and between-team differences (rwg and intraclass correlations). Correlational analyses of the subscales revealed that they measure related yet distinctive aspects of ACT team processes, and regression analyses demonstrated predictive validity (encounter preparedness is related to staff outcomes). Conclusions: The TACT scale demonstrated high reliability and validity and can be included in research and evaluation of teamwork in ACT and mental health teams.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1108-1117
Number of pages10
JournalPsychiatric Services
Volume63
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2012

Fingerprint

Community Mental Health Services
Reproducibility of Results
Statistical Factor Analysis
Mental Health

Cite this

The Teamwork in Assertive Community Treatment (TACT) scale : Development and validation. / Wholey, Douglas R; Zhu, Xi; Knoke, David H; Shah, Pri P; Zellmer-Bruhn, Mary E; Witheridge, Thomas F.

In: Psychiatric Services, Vol. 63, No. 11, 01.11.2012, p. 1108-1117.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{01c58ce2cedd48fbb4dc5de562c83a61,
title = "The Teamwork in Assertive Community Treatment (TACT) scale: Development and validation",
abstract = "Objective: Team design is meticulously specified for assertive community treatment (ACT) teams, yet performance can vary across ACT teams, even those with high fidelity. By developing and validating the Teamwork in Assertive Community Treatment (TACT) scale, investigators examined the role of team processes in ACT performance. Methods: The TACT scale measuring ACT teamwork was developed from a conceptual model grounded in organizational research and adapted for the ACT and mental health context. TACT subscales were constructed after exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. The reliability, discriminant validity, predictive validity, temporal stability, internal consistency, and within-team agreement were established with surveys from approximately 300 members of 26 Minnesota ACT teams who completed the questionnaire three times, at six-month intervals. Results: Nine TACT subscales emerged from the analyses: exploration, exploitation of new and existing knowledge, psychological safety, goal agreement, conflict, constructive controversy, information accessibility, encounter preparedness, and consumer-centered care. These nine subscales demonstrated fit and temporal stability (confirmatory factor analysis), high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), and within-team agreement and between-team differences (rwg and intraclass correlations). Correlational analyses of the subscales revealed that they measure related yet distinctive aspects of ACT team processes, and regression analyses demonstrated predictive validity (encounter preparedness is related to staff outcomes). Conclusions: The TACT scale demonstrated high reliability and validity and can be included in research and evaluation of teamwork in ACT and mental health teams.",
author = "Wholey, {Douglas R} and Xi Zhu and Knoke, {David H} and Shah, {Pri P} and Zellmer-Bruhn, {Mary E} and Witheridge, {Thomas F.}",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1176/appi.ps.201100338",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "63",
pages = "1108--1117",
journal = "Psychiatric Services",
issn = "1075-2730",
publisher = "American Psychiatric Association",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Teamwork in Assertive Community Treatment (TACT) scale

T2 - Development and validation

AU - Wholey, Douglas R

AU - Zhu, Xi

AU - Knoke, David H

AU - Shah, Pri P

AU - Zellmer-Bruhn, Mary E

AU - Witheridge, Thomas F.

PY - 2012/11/1

Y1 - 2012/11/1

N2 - Objective: Team design is meticulously specified for assertive community treatment (ACT) teams, yet performance can vary across ACT teams, even those with high fidelity. By developing and validating the Teamwork in Assertive Community Treatment (TACT) scale, investigators examined the role of team processes in ACT performance. Methods: The TACT scale measuring ACT teamwork was developed from a conceptual model grounded in organizational research and adapted for the ACT and mental health context. TACT subscales were constructed after exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. The reliability, discriminant validity, predictive validity, temporal stability, internal consistency, and within-team agreement were established with surveys from approximately 300 members of 26 Minnesota ACT teams who completed the questionnaire three times, at six-month intervals. Results: Nine TACT subscales emerged from the analyses: exploration, exploitation of new and existing knowledge, psychological safety, goal agreement, conflict, constructive controversy, information accessibility, encounter preparedness, and consumer-centered care. These nine subscales demonstrated fit and temporal stability (confirmatory factor analysis), high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), and within-team agreement and between-team differences (rwg and intraclass correlations). Correlational analyses of the subscales revealed that they measure related yet distinctive aspects of ACT team processes, and regression analyses demonstrated predictive validity (encounter preparedness is related to staff outcomes). Conclusions: The TACT scale demonstrated high reliability and validity and can be included in research and evaluation of teamwork in ACT and mental health teams.

AB - Objective: Team design is meticulously specified for assertive community treatment (ACT) teams, yet performance can vary across ACT teams, even those with high fidelity. By developing and validating the Teamwork in Assertive Community Treatment (TACT) scale, investigators examined the role of team processes in ACT performance. Methods: The TACT scale measuring ACT teamwork was developed from a conceptual model grounded in organizational research and adapted for the ACT and mental health context. TACT subscales were constructed after exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. The reliability, discriminant validity, predictive validity, temporal stability, internal consistency, and within-team agreement were established with surveys from approximately 300 members of 26 Minnesota ACT teams who completed the questionnaire three times, at six-month intervals. Results: Nine TACT subscales emerged from the analyses: exploration, exploitation of new and existing knowledge, psychological safety, goal agreement, conflict, constructive controversy, information accessibility, encounter preparedness, and consumer-centered care. These nine subscales demonstrated fit and temporal stability (confirmatory factor analysis), high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), and within-team agreement and between-team differences (rwg and intraclass correlations). Correlational analyses of the subscales revealed that they measure related yet distinctive aspects of ACT team processes, and regression analyses demonstrated predictive validity (encounter preparedness is related to staff outcomes). Conclusions: The TACT scale demonstrated high reliability and validity and can be included in research and evaluation of teamwork in ACT and mental health teams.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870030910&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84870030910&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1176/appi.ps.201100338

DO - 10.1176/appi.ps.201100338

M3 - Article

C2 - 22948786

AN - SCOPUS:84870030910

VL - 63

SP - 1108

EP - 1117

JO - Psychiatric Services

JF - Psychiatric Services

SN - 1075-2730

IS - 11

ER -