The taxon concept: Is it taxonic?

William M. Grove

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

The question of whether the concept of a "taxon" (a nonarbitrary latent category) is itself categorical, or is a matter of degree, has lain dormant within taxometrics. I analyze the problem conceptually. Part of the meaning of "taxon," I hold, goes beyond the manifest statistical properties of admixed probability distributions; any of certain forms of causal nexus leading to admixed distributions are involved as well. I defend the thesis that the threshold question, "Is there a taxon?" has a yes-or-no answer, establishing that "taxonicity" is categorical (taxonic), but also that as some taxa are much more readily distinguished from their complement classes than are others, the taxon question is also quantitative. It is on this basis that Meehl and others held the view that taxonicity is a matter of degree; however, they were wrong to hold that it is only a matter of degree.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)903-910
Number of pages8
JournalPsychological reports
Volume102
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2008

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The taxon concept: Is it taxonic?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this