Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The state sets the rate: The relationship among state-specific college binge drinking, state binge drinking rates, and selected state alcohol control policies

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Objectives. We assessed the relationship between college binge drinking, binge drinking in the general population, and selected alcohol control policies. Methods. We analyzed binge drinking rates from 2 national surveys, the Harvard School of Public Health College Alcohol Study and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Binge drinking data were linked to a summary measure of 7 salient alcohol control policies and a rating of resources devoted to law enforcement. Results. State-level college and adult binge drinking rates were strongly correlated (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.43; P<.01). Attending college in states with the lowest binge drinking rates (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.41, 0.97) and presence of more stringent alcohol control policies (adjusted OR = 0.57; 95% CI = 0.33, 0.97) were independent predictors of student binge drinking, after adjusting for state law enforcement and individual-, college-, and state-level covariates. Conclusions. State of residence is a predictor of binge drinking by college students. State-level alcohol control policies may help reduce binge drinking among college students and in the general population.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)441-446
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican journal of public health
Volume95
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2005

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The state sets the rate: The relationship among state-specific college binge drinking, state binge drinking rates, and selected state alcohol control policies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this