The State of Dyadic Methodology: An Analysis of the Literature on Interventions for Military Couples

Melissa Lewis, Angela Lamson, Mark White

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Military members and their spouses experience unique stressors compared with civilian couples, making them distinctively vulnerable to a number of marital and mental health concerns. However, the amount and quality of intervention research to guide treatment for military couples are unknown. Therefore, a systematic literature search of interventions for military couples was completed resulting in 10 articles that met the study's inclusion and exclusion criteria. Further, a rubric to assess dyadic methodology was created and utilized to determine the dyadic quality of the methodology of the sampled articles. The results of the systematic literature review revealed that (a) there are few evidence-based interventions for military couples in which both members of the dyad are included and (b) the methodology by which treatments are evaluated largely do not employ systemic or dyadic measures. Recommendations for future research with military couples includes the need for couple-focused interventions using experimental methodology, systemic theories to guide intervention and research, and appropriate dyadic assessment and analysis tools to determine the effectiveness of couple's interventions for military, reserve, and veteran populations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)135-157
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Couple and Relationship Therapy
Volume15
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2 2016

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Keywords

  • advanced quantitative methodology
  • assessment of couple relationships
  • Research methodology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The State of Dyadic Methodology: An Analysis of the Literature on Interventions for Military Couples'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this