TY - JOUR
T1 - The State of Dyadic Methodology
T2 - An Analysis of the Literature on Interventions for Military Couples
AU - Lewis, Melissa
AU - Lamson, Angela
AU - White, Mark
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2016/4/2
Y1 - 2016/4/2
N2 - Military members and their spouses experience unique stressors compared with civilian couples, making them distinctively vulnerable to a number of marital and mental health concerns. However, the amount and quality of intervention research to guide treatment for military couples are unknown. Therefore, a systematic literature search of interventions for military couples was completed resulting in 10 articles that met the study's inclusion and exclusion criteria. Further, a rubric to assess dyadic methodology was created and utilized to determine the dyadic quality of the methodology of the sampled articles. The results of the systematic literature review revealed that (a) there are few evidence-based interventions for military couples in which both members of the dyad are included and (b) the methodology by which treatments are evaluated largely do not employ systemic or dyadic measures. Recommendations for future research with military couples includes the need for couple-focused interventions using experimental methodology, systemic theories to guide intervention and research, and appropriate dyadic assessment and analysis tools to determine the effectiveness of couple's interventions for military, reserve, and veteran populations.
AB - Military members and their spouses experience unique stressors compared with civilian couples, making them distinctively vulnerable to a number of marital and mental health concerns. However, the amount and quality of intervention research to guide treatment for military couples are unknown. Therefore, a systematic literature search of interventions for military couples was completed resulting in 10 articles that met the study's inclusion and exclusion criteria. Further, a rubric to assess dyadic methodology was created and utilized to determine the dyadic quality of the methodology of the sampled articles. The results of the systematic literature review revealed that (a) there are few evidence-based interventions for military couples in which both members of the dyad are included and (b) the methodology by which treatments are evaluated largely do not employ systemic or dyadic measures. Recommendations for future research with military couples includes the need for couple-focused interventions using experimental methodology, systemic theories to guide intervention and research, and appropriate dyadic assessment and analysis tools to determine the effectiveness of couple's interventions for military, reserve, and veteran populations.
KW - advanced quantitative methodology
KW - assessment of couple relationships
KW - Research methodology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960126313&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84960126313&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/15332691.2015.1106998
DO - 10.1080/15332691.2015.1106998
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84960126313
SN - 1533-2691
VL - 15
SP - 135
EP - 157
JO - Journal of Couple and Relationship Therapy
JF - Journal of Couple and Relationship Therapy
IS - 2
ER -