Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Stakes of Symbolic Boundaries

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Sociological theories of symbolic boundaries (understandings of who belongs to in-groups and out-groups) and social boundaries (material stratification) argue both are related, but empirical analyses often focus on one or the other. Using survey data from 2014, we replicate and validate earlier research describing patterns in how Americans draw symbolic boundaries against a range of minority groups. We then go beyond this work by demonstrating a new link between boundary-drawing and attitudes about inequality and civil liberties with material implications. Drawing symbolic boundaries is not a benign practice; rather, it is associated with willingness to draw social boundaries that support material and political inequality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)309-333
Number of pages25
JournalSociological Quarterly
Volume61
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, © 2019 Midwest Sociological Society.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • Public opinion
  • culture
  • symbolic boundaries

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Stakes of Symbolic Boundaries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this