Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
Experts@Minnesota Home
Search content at Experts@Minnesota
Home
Profiles
Research units
University Assets
Projects and Grants
Research output
Datasets
Press/Media
Activities
Fellowships, Honors, and Prizes
Impacts
The safety and efficacy of approaches to liver resection: A meta-analysis
Nicole R. Jackson
, Adam Hauch
, Tian Hu
, Joseph F. Buell
, Douglas P. Slakey
, Emad Kandil
Epidemiology & Community Health
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Article
›
peer-review
50
Link opens in a new tab
Scopus citations
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The safety and efficacy of approaches to liver resection: A meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Between-group
25%
Complication Rate
25%
Confidence Interval
75%
Conventional Laparotomy
50%
Cost Measures
25%
Embase
25%
Estimated Blood Loss
75%
Group-level Outcome
25%
Hepatectomy
25%
Laparoscopic Approach
100%
Laparoscopic Hepatectomy
25%
Laparotomy
25%
Length of Hospital Stay
75%
Liver Resection
100%
Long Length
25%
Meta-analysis
100%
Minimally Invasive
25%
Minimally Invasive Approach
25%
Mortality Costs
25%
Net Change
25%
Odds Ratio
25%
Oncologic
25%
Open Approach
25%
Outcome Comparison
25%
Perioperative Complication Rate
25%
Postoperative Complications
25%
Postoperative Mortality
75%
PubMed
25%
Random Effects Model
25%
Rate Measures
25%
Relative Risk
25%
Resection Margin
25%
Robotic Approach
100%
Robotic Liver
25%
Surgical Margin
25%
Total Operative Time
50%
Medicine and Dentistry
Bleeding
75%
Health Care Cost
25%
Hepatectomy
100%
Independent Reviewer
25%
Laparotomy
75%
Meta-Analysis
100%
Mortality Rate
75%
Odds Ratio
25%
Peroperative Complication
25%
Postoperative Complication
25%
Random Effects Model
25%
Surgical Margin
50%
Surgical Mortality
25%
Systematic Review
25%