The rules of engagement: Comparing two social protest movements on YouTube

Emily K. Vraga, Leticia Bode, Chris Wells, Kevin Driscoll, Kjerstin Thorson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Social media Web sites such as YouTube offer activists unique opportunities to reach out to new audiences through a variety of diverse appeals. Yet the rules of engagement on social media should depend on the structures, goals, and characteristics of the movements engaging in this outreach. To explore how differences in social movements translate into online activism, we employ a paired case study approach, comparing YouTube artifacts for two political mobilizations: the Occupy Movement and California's Proposition 8 ballot initiative concerning same sex marriage. Across movements, we examine the popularity of videos and their characteristics, and whether the type of video consistently predicts video engagement. We find that "social media activism" is not a unitary phenomenon; the two mobilizations produced unique YouTube ecologies. Occupy Wall Street videos tended on average to produce less engagement and focused on filmed live events and amateur content. Meanwhile, Proposition 8 videos usually produced more engagement and bridged more diverse formats: from professionalized and scripted content to live event footage and unscripted monologues to the camera. Therefore, our study suggests that social activism in online spaces such as YouTube is not easily defined, but is adapted to suit movement needs - which makes social media a popular and flexible venue for activism but also highlights the challenges for scholars studying such venues.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)133-140
Number of pages8
JournalCyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
Volume17
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2014

Fingerprint

Social Media
protest movement
Ecology
Websites
social media
video
Cameras
mobilization
Marriage
Artifacts
event
amateur
Social Movements
popularity
ecology
appeal
artifact
marriage

Cite this

The rules of engagement : Comparing two social protest movements on YouTube. / Vraga, Emily K.; Bode, Leticia; Wells, Chris; Driscoll, Kevin; Thorson, Kjerstin.

In: Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, Vol. 17, No. 3, 01.03.2014, p. 133-140.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Vraga, Emily K. ; Bode, Leticia ; Wells, Chris ; Driscoll, Kevin ; Thorson, Kjerstin. / The rules of engagement : Comparing two social protest movements on YouTube. In: Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 2014 ; Vol. 17, No. 3. pp. 133-140.
@article{fff649a66b2e4a61a5f6d1f6802e4499,
title = "The rules of engagement: Comparing two social protest movements on YouTube",
abstract = "Social media Web sites such as YouTube offer activists unique opportunities to reach out to new audiences through a variety of diverse appeals. Yet the rules of engagement on social media should depend on the structures, goals, and characteristics of the movements engaging in this outreach. To explore how differences in social movements translate into online activism, we employ a paired case study approach, comparing YouTube artifacts for two political mobilizations: the Occupy Movement and California's Proposition 8 ballot initiative concerning same sex marriage. Across movements, we examine the popularity of videos and their characteristics, and whether the type of video consistently predicts video engagement. We find that {"}social media activism{"} is not a unitary phenomenon; the two mobilizations produced unique YouTube ecologies. Occupy Wall Street videos tended on average to produce less engagement and focused on filmed live events and amateur content. Meanwhile, Proposition 8 videos usually produced more engagement and bridged more diverse formats: from professionalized and scripted content to live event footage and unscripted monologues to the camera. Therefore, our study suggests that social activism in online spaces such as YouTube is not easily defined, but is adapted to suit movement needs - which makes social media a popular and flexible venue for activism but also highlights the challenges for scholars studying such venues.",
author = "Vraga, {Emily K.} and Leticia Bode and Chris Wells and Kevin Driscoll and Kjerstin Thorson",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/cyber.2013.0117",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "133--140",
journal = "Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking",
issn = "2152-2715",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The rules of engagement

T2 - Comparing two social protest movements on YouTube

AU - Vraga, Emily K.

AU - Bode, Leticia

AU - Wells, Chris

AU - Driscoll, Kevin

AU - Thorson, Kjerstin

PY - 2014/3/1

Y1 - 2014/3/1

N2 - Social media Web sites such as YouTube offer activists unique opportunities to reach out to new audiences through a variety of diverse appeals. Yet the rules of engagement on social media should depend on the structures, goals, and characteristics of the movements engaging in this outreach. To explore how differences in social movements translate into online activism, we employ a paired case study approach, comparing YouTube artifacts for two political mobilizations: the Occupy Movement and California's Proposition 8 ballot initiative concerning same sex marriage. Across movements, we examine the popularity of videos and their characteristics, and whether the type of video consistently predicts video engagement. We find that "social media activism" is not a unitary phenomenon; the two mobilizations produced unique YouTube ecologies. Occupy Wall Street videos tended on average to produce less engagement and focused on filmed live events and amateur content. Meanwhile, Proposition 8 videos usually produced more engagement and bridged more diverse formats: from professionalized and scripted content to live event footage and unscripted monologues to the camera. Therefore, our study suggests that social activism in online spaces such as YouTube is not easily defined, but is adapted to suit movement needs - which makes social media a popular and flexible venue for activism but also highlights the challenges for scholars studying such venues.

AB - Social media Web sites such as YouTube offer activists unique opportunities to reach out to new audiences through a variety of diverse appeals. Yet the rules of engagement on social media should depend on the structures, goals, and characteristics of the movements engaging in this outreach. To explore how differences in social movements translate into online activism, we employ a paired case study approach, comparing YouTube artifacts for two political mobilizations: the Occupy Movement and California's Proposition 8 ballot initiative concerning same sex marriage. Across movements, we examine the popularity of videos and their characteristics, and whether the type of video consistently predicts video engagement. We find that "social media activism" is not a unitary phenomenon; the two mobilizations produced unique YouTube ecologies. Occupy Wall Street videos tended on average to produce less engagement and focused on filmed live events and amateur content. Meanwhile, Proposition 8 videos usually produced more engagement and bridged more diverse formats: from professionalized and scripted content to live event footage and unscripted monologues to the camera. Therefore, our study suggests that social activism in online spaces such as YouTube is not easily defined, but is adapted to suit movement needs - which makes social media a popular and flexible venue for activism but also highlights the challenges for scholars studying such venues.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84897594039&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84897594039&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/cyber.2013.0117

DO - 10.1089/cyber.2013.0117

M3 - Article

C2 - 24111598

AN - SCOPUS:84897594039

VL - 17

SP - 133

EP - 140

JO - Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

JF - Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

SN - 2152-2715

IS - 3

ER -