Abstract
Environmental and ecological research has long been characterized as operating along a continuum, with "basic" - representing "investigator-initiated" research - at one end and "applied" - representing "mission-initiated" research - at the other. While federal agency science programs ideally occupy points along this continuum, the resulting science has not always been relevant to solving environmental problems. Here, we suggest that environmental problem-solving by federal agencies has been less effective than it might have been, because of a need for more effective, long-term strategic planning, cooperation across agencies, and incentives for scientists to participate in policy development and implementation. We make suggestions about what federal agencies can do to improve the integration of science, policy, and natural resource management. First, we refer to agency examples, using regulatory (acid deposition) and land management (national forest) issues to illustrate how environmental research intersects with policy development and its implementation. Second, we discuss the barriers that inhibit the application of scientific knowledge in developing and implementing policy - from the perspective of a federal agency and of an individual scientist. Finally, we generate a series of specific recommendations, targeted at federal agencies, individual scientists, and decision makers.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 322-328 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 2010 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The role of federal agencies in the application of scientific knowledge'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS