The role of binocular information in the control of perception and action

Albert Yonas, Hugo Bruggeman, Juergen Konczak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: This study examined the dissociation of perception and action when participants judged the orientation of a frontal trapezoid window or pointed to its edges. Viewed monocularly the perspective cues in the display create the illusion of a window strongly slanted in depth. When viewed binocularly, the illusion is reduced. Method: Participants (N=14, mean age 24 yrs.) wore LCD goggles allowing random presentation of monocular and binocular vision over trials. For the Perceptual Task participants aligned the orientation of a rod that was slowly rotated by an experimenter to match the orientation of the display (total viewing time: 7.5s). For the Motor Task participants pointed with their index fingers to the side of the display without touching it (total viewing time: 2.5s). Finger movements were recorded with an optoelectronic camera system. The perceived orientation angle (perceptual error), the transverse plane angle between the two finger tips (motor error) and reaction time (RT) were analyzed. Results: The average perceptual error with respect to the true orientation of the display was 13.9° for binocular vision and 24.9° for monocular vision. The average motor error was 1.3° for binocular vision and 19.6° for monocular vision. Preliminary analysis revealed an average RT of 214ms for binocular vision and 227ms for monocular vision. Conclusions: Perspective cues for slant induced errors in both perception and action. However, during pointing towards the trapezoid window only the monocular presentation caused significant motor error. These results demonstrate that binocular information has a differential influence on perception and action, which may reflect processing differences in the dorsal and ventral visual stream.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Vision
Volume2
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2002

Fingerprint

Monocular Vision
Binocular Vision
Fingers
Reaction Time
Cues
Eye Protective Devices

Cite this

The role of binocular information in the control of perception and action. / Yonas, Albert; Bruggeman, Hugo; Konczak, Juergen.

In: Journal of Vision, Vol. 2, No. 7, 01.12.2002.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1912b32071244d7a90d833c2dd00fa09,
title = "The role of binocular information in the control of perception and action",
abstract = "Purpose: This study examined the dissociation of perception and action when participants judged the orientation of a frontal trapezoid window or pointed to its edges. Viewed monocularly the perspective cues in the display create the illusion of a window strongly slanted in depth. When viewed binocularly, the illusion is reduced. Method: Participants (N=14, mean age 24 yrs.) wore LCD goggles allowing random presentation of monocular and binocular vision over trials. For the Perceptual Task participants aligned the orientation of a rod that was slowly rotated by an experimenter to match the orientation of the display (total viewing time: 7.5s). For the Motor Task participants pointed with their index fingers to the side of the display without touching it (total viewing time: 2.5s). Finger movements were recorded with an optoelectronic camera system. The perceived orientation angle (perceptual error), the transverse plane angle between the two finger tips (motor error) and reaction time (RT) were analyzed. Results: The average perceptual error with respect to the true orientation of the display was 13.9° for binocular vision and 24.9° for monocular vision. The average motor error was 1.3° for binocular vision and 19.6° for monocular vision. Preliminary analysis revealed an average RT of 214ms for binocular vision and 227ms for monocular vision. Conclusions: Perspective cues for slant induced errors in both perception and action. However, during pointing towards the trapezoid window only the monocular presentation caused significant motor error. These results demonstrate that binocular information has a differential influence on perception and action, which may reflect processing differences in the dorsal and ventral visual stream.",
author = "Albert Yonas and Hugo Bruggeman and Juergen Konczak",
year = "2002",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1167/2.7.51",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
journal = "Journal of Vision",
issn = "1534-7362",
publisher = "Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of binocular information in the control of perception and action

AU - Yonas, Albert

AU - Bruggeman, Hugo

AU - Konczak, Juergen

PY - 2002/12/1

Y1 - 2002/12/1

N2 - Purpose: This study examined the dissociation of perception and action when participants judged the orientation of a frontal trapezoid window or pointed to its edges. Viewed monocularly the perspective cues in the display create the illusion of a window strongly slanted in depth. When viewed binocularly, the illusion is reduced. Method: Participants (N=14, mean age 24 yrs.) wore LCD goggles allowing random presentation of monocular and binocular vision over trials. For the Perceptual Task participants aligned the orientation of a rod that was slowly rotated by an experimenter to match the orientation of the display (total viewing time: 7.5s). For the Motor Task participants pointed with their index fingers to the side of the display without touching it (total viewing time: 2.5s). Finger movements were recorded with an optoelectronic camera system. The perceived orientation angle (perceptual error), the transverse plane angle between the two finger tips (motor error) and reaction time (RT) were analyzed. Results: The average perceptual error with respect to the true orientation of the display was 13.9° for binocular vision and 24.9° for monocular vision. The average motor error was 1.3° for binocular vision and 19.6° for monocular vision. Preliminary analysis revealed an average RT of 214ms for binocular vision and 227ms for monocular vision. Conclusions: Perspective cues for slant induced errors in both perception and action. However, during pointing towards the trapezoid window only the monocular presentation caused significant motor error. These results demonstrate that binocular information has a differential influence on perception and action, which may reflect processing differences in the dorsal and ventral visual stream.

AB - Purpose: This study examined the dissociation of perception and action when participants judged the orientation of a frontal trapezoid window or pointed to its edges. Viewed monocularly the perspective cues in the display create the illusion of a window strongly slanted in depth. When viewed binocularly, the illusion is reduced. Method: Participants (N=14, mean age 24 yrs.) wore LCD goggles allowing random presentation of monocular and binocular vision over trials. For the Perceptual Task participants aligned the orientation of a rod that was slowly rotated by an experimenter to match the orientation of the display (total viewing time: 7.5s). For the Motor Task participants pointed with their index fingers to the side of the display without touching it (total viewing time: 2.5s). Finger movements were recorded with an optoelectronic camera system. The perceived orientation angle (perceptual error), the transverse plane angle between the two finger tips (motor error) and reaction time (RT) were analyzed. Results: The average perceptual error with respect to the true orientation of the display was 13.9° for binocular vision and 24.9° for monocular vision. The average motor error was 1.3° for binocular vision and 19.6° for monocular vision. Preliminary analysis revealed an average RT of 214ms for binocular vision and 227ms for monocular vision. Conclusions: Perspective cues for slant induced errors in both perception and action. However, during pointing towards the trapezoid window only the monocular presentation caused significant motor error. These results demonstrate that binocular information has a differential influence on perception and action, which may reflect processing differences in the dorsal and ventral visual stream.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4243147173&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4243147173&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1167/2.7.51

DO - 10.1167/2.7.51

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:4243147173

VL - 2

JO - Journal of Vision

JF - Journal of Vision

SN - 1534-7362

IS - 7

ER -