The road to recovery from a natural disaster: Voices from the community

P. A. Onstad; Sharon M Danes; A. M. Hardman; P. D. Olson; Mary S Marczak; R. K. Heins; Sara R Croymans; K. A. Coffee

doi:10.1080/15575330.2012.699081

The road to recovery from a natural disaster: Voices from the community

P. A. Onstad, Sharon M Danes, A. M. Hardman, P. D. Olson, Mary S Marczak, R. K. Heins, Sara R Croymans, K. A. Coffee

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

22 Scopus citations

Abstract

The study's major theme is that community sustainability after natural disasters depends on adaptive capacities of individuals, families and businesses. Action research grounded in a community resilience theory (Norris, Stevens, Pfefferbaum, Wyche, & Pfefferbaum, 2008) and NVOAD's (National Voluntary Organizations Active in Disaster) recovery model assumptions found support for five community implementation strategies used in a rural community's flood recovery and resilience process. Two years after the flood devastated over 90% of businesses and 65% of homes, collective, yet varied, community voices shared what worked and what did not work.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	566-580
Number of pages	15
Journal	Community Development
Volume	43
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2012.699081
State	Published - Dec 2012

Bibliographical note

Copyright:
Copyright 2012 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Keywords

community resilience
disaster recovery
natural disasters

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Publisher link

10.1080/15575330.2012.699081

Find It

Find It at U of M Libraries

Cite this

@article{9d91fbe6034944f09f36797ff12756dc,

title = "The road to recovery from a natural disaster: Voices from the community",

abstract = "The study's major theme is that community sustainability after natural disasters depends on adaptive capacities of individuals, families and businesses. Action research grounded in a community resilience theory (Norris, Stevens, Pfefferbaum, Wyche, & Pfefferbaum, 2008) and NVOAD's (National Voluntary Organizations Active in Disaster) recovery model assumptions found support for five community implementation strategies used in a rural community's flood recovery and resilience process. Two years after the flood devastated over 90% of businesses and 65% of homes, collective, yet varied, community voices shared what worked and what did not work.",

keywords = "community resilience, disaster recovery, natural disasters",

author = "Onstad, {P. A.} and Danes, {Sharon M} and Hardman, {A. M.} and Olson, {P. D.} and Marczak, {Mary S} and Heins, {R. K.} and Croymans, {Sara R} and Coffee, {K. A.}",

year = "2012",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1080/15575330.2012.699081",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "43",

pages = "566--580",

journal = "Community Development",

issn = "1557-5330",

publisher = "Routledge",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The road to recovery from a natural disaster

T2 - Voices from the community

AU - Onstad, P. A.

AU - Danes, Sharon M

AU - Hardman, A. M.

AU - Olson, P. D.

AU - Marczak, Mary S

AU - Heins, R. K.

AU - Croymans, Sara R

AU - Coffee, K. A.

PY - 2012/12

Y1 - 2012/12

N2 - The study's major theme is that community sustainability after natural disasters depends on adaptive capacities of individuals, families and businesses. Action research grounded in a community resilience theory (Norris, Stevens, Pfefferbaum, Wyche, & Pfefferbaum, 2008) and NVOAD's (National Voluntary Organizations Active in Disaster) recovery model assumptions found support for five community implementation strategies used in a rural community's flood recovery and resilience process. Two years after the flood devastated over 90% of businesses and 65% of homes, collective, yet varied, community voices shared what worked and what did not work.

AB - The study's major theme is that community sustainability after natural disasters depends on adaptive capacities of individuals, families and businesses. Action research grounded in a community resilience theory (Norris, Stevens, Pfefferbaum, Wyche, & Pfefferbaum, 2008) and NVOAD's (National Voluntary Organizations Active in Disaster) recovery model assumptions found support for five community implementation strategies used in a rural community's flood recovery and resilience process. Two years after the flood devastated over 90% of businesses and 65% of homes, collective, yet varied, community voices shared what worked and what did not work.

KW - community resilience

KW - disaster recovery

KW - natural disasters

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871279559&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84871279559&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15575330.2012.699081

DO - 10.1080/15575330.2012.699081

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84871279559

SN - 1557-5330

VL - 43

SP - 566

EP - 580

JO - Community Development

JF - Community Development

IS - 5

ER -

The road to recovery from a natural disaster: Voices from the community

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

UN SDGs

Publisher link

Find It

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this