The right to a fair trial is a fundamental human right. This chapter begins by summarizing the basic components and protections of a fair trial as established by international human rights standards. It next examines how fair-trial standards apply to extraordinary courts by looking at both their theoretical and practical application. The essay concludes by suggesting that extraordinary courts present a serious, recurring risk of denying a fair trial to those persons subject to trial and that more must be done to address the gap between norms and practice. This chapter uses the terms “extraordinary” and “special” interchangeably. Precisely defining an extraordinary court is an elusive task and one that interpretive bodies have largely avoided. The broadest definition of a special court, as Amnesty International uses the term, is that special courts are those procedures that try categories of people on the basis of special legal status (such as juveniles or suspected terrorists) or particular categories of offenses. Another potential definition characterizes special courts as those tribunals that lack certain guarantees of independence and impartiality. It would, however, be circular reasoning to define a legal proceeding as lacking impartiality and independence and then to evaluate those same procedures for their independence and impartiality. This chapter uses the terms extraordinary and special courts more narrowly to describe domestic courts specifically created to try offenses related to state security (broadly conceived), the use of military courts to try civilians, or where governments themselves categorize the procedures as special. Many of these courts suffer from procedural defects, including a lack of such fundamental attributes as independence and impartiality.
|Original language||English (US)|
|Title of host publication||Guantanamo and Beyond|
|Subtitle of host publication||Exceptional Courts and Military Commissions in Comparative Perspective|
|Publisher||Cambridge University Press|
|Number of pages||16|
|State||Published - Jan 1 2013|
Bibliographical notePublisher Copyright:
© Cambridge University Press 2013.