Abstract
This paper examines the accuracy and usefulness of estimated rates of return to schooling based on the standard human capital model of Becker and Mincer. Regarding accuracy, it investigates whether failure to account for differences in ability and school quality lead to significant biases. Estimates using Ghanaian data confirm this possibility. Even when accurate, estimated rates of return to additional years of schooling may have limited policy implications; more useful for governments are rates of return to investments in school quality. The paper uses data on cognitive skills to estimate rates of return to three types of school quality improvements.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 267-290 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Journal of Development Economics |
| Volume | 51 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 1 1996 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Keywords
- Ghana
- I21
- Investments in education
- J24
- O15
- Returns to schooling
- School quality
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The relevance of standard estimates of rates of return to schooling for education policy: A critical assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS