TY - JOUR
T1 - The relationship of nondirectiveness to genetic counseling
T2 - Report of a workshop at the 2003 NSGC Annual Education Conference
AU - Weil, Jon
AU - Ormond, Kelly
AU - Peters, June
AU - Peters, Kathryn
AU - Biesecker, Barbara Bowles
AU - LeRoy, Bonnie
PY - 2006/4
Y1 - 2006/4
N2 - Nondirectiveness has been a guiding principle for genetic counseling since the founding of the profession. However, its efficacy and appropriateness in this role have been frequently questioned. A workshop at the 2003 Annual Education Conference of the National Society of Genetic Counselors provided audience participation in a discussion of these issues. Participants presented arguments for and against nondirectiveness as a central ethos. They described complex personal transitions in adapting what they had learned about nondirectiveness during training to the realities of the workplace. There was support for flexible approaches to genetic counseling, with varying adherence to nondirectiveness, based on client and family needs and values, clinical circumstances, and desired counseling outcomes. The discussion supports the use of clinical experience, outcomes research, and the experience of other professions to move beyond nondirectiveness and more accurately identify the theoretical bases that underlie genetic counseling in the variety of circumstances in which it is currently practiced.
AB - Nondirectiveness has been a guiding principle for genetic counseling since the founding of the profession. However, its efficacy and appropriateness in this role have been frequently questioned. A workshop at the 2003 Annual Education Conference of the National Society of Genetic Counselors provided audience participation in a discussion of these issues. Participants presented arguments for and against nondirectiveness as a central ethos. They described complex personal transitions in adapting what they had learned about nondirectiveness during training to the realities of the workplace. There was support for flexible approaches to genetic counseling, with varying adherence to nondirectiveness, based on client and family needs and values, clinical circumstances, and desired counseling outcomes. The discussion supports the use of clinical experience, outcomes research, and the experience of other professions to move beyond nondirectiveness and more accurately identify the theoretical bases that underlie genetic counseling in the variety of circumstances in which it is currently practiced.
KW - Genetic counseling
KW - Nondirective counseling
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/33745041941
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/33745041941#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1007/s10897-005-9008-1
DO - 10.1007/s10897-005-9008-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 16525897
AN - SCOPUS:33745041941
SN - 1059-7700
VL - 15
SP - 85
EP - 93
JO - Journal of Genetic Counseling
JF - Journal of Genetic Counseling
IS - 2
ER -