TY - JOUR
T1 - The Rehnquist Court and indigenous rights
T2 - The expedited diminution of native powers of governance
AU - Wilkins, David E
AU - Richotte, Keith
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2003
Y1 - 2003
N2 - The U.S. Supreme Court has long played a prominent role in defining, critiquing, and, in some cases, rearranging the political relationship between indigenous peoples and the states and the federal government, and in enlarging or reducing the inherent sovereign status of native peoples. This article assesses the most recent Supreme Court opinions that are systematically, and without reference to judicial precedent, redefining the political status of tribal nations by reducing their heretofore acknowledged sovereign authority from an internal perspective and especially from an intergovernmental standpoint. Although the U.S. Congress still adheres to a policy of tribal self-determination, the Court is dramatically and permanently minimizing the rights of tribes to practice political, economic, and cultural self-determination because in the opinion of a majority of the justices, there are only two sovereigns in the United States: states and the federal government.
AB - The U.S. Supreme Court has long played a prominent role in defining, critiquing, and, in some cases, rearranging the political relationship between indigenous peoples and the states and the federal government, and in enlarging or reducing the inherent sovereign status of native peoples. This article assesses the most recent Supreme Court opinions that are systematically, and without reference to judicial precedent, redefining the political status of tribal nations by reducing their heretofore acknowledged sovereign authority from an internal perspective and especially from an intergovernmental standpoint. Although the U.S. Congress still adheres to a policy of tribal self-determination, the Court is dramatically and permanently minimizing the rights of tribes to practice political, economic, and cultural self-determination because in the opinion of a majority of the justices, there are only two sovereigns in the United States: states and the federal government.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3042719275&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3042719275&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a005004
DO - 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a005004
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:3042719275
VL - 33
SP - 83-110+164
JO - Publius
JF - Publius
SN - 0048-5950
IS - 3
ER -