The quarterback prediction problem: Forecasting the performance of college quarterbacks selected in the NFL draft

Julian Wolfson, Vittorio Addona, Robert H. Schmicker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

National Football League (NFL) teams spend substantial time and money trying to predict which college quarterbacks eligible to be drafted into the NFL will have successful professional careers. But despite this investment of resources, it is common for quarterbacks to perform much better or worse than anticipated. Prior work on this "quarterback prediction problem" has concluded that NFL teams are poor at determining which quarterbacks are likely to be successful based on information available prior to the draft. However, these analyses have generally focused only on quarterbacks who played in the NFL, ignoring those who were drafted but did not appear in a professional game. Using data on all quarterbacks drafted since 1997, we considered the problem of predicting NFL success as defined by two metrics (games played and Net Points), based on when a quarterback was drafted and his performances in college and at the NFL Combine. Our analyses suggest that college and combine statistics have little value for predicting whether a quarterback will be successful in the NFL. Contrary to previous work, we conclude that NFL teams aggregate pre-draft information-including qualitative observations-quite effectively, and their inability to consistently identify college quarterbacks who will excel in the professional ranks is a consequence of random variability in future performance due to factors which are unlikely to be observable.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number12
JournalJournal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports
Volume7
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2011

Fingerprint

performance
professional career
available information
money
statistics
Draft
National Football League
Prediction
resources
time

Keywords

  • NFL
  • NFL draft
  • college football
  • football
  • prediction
  • quarterback

Cite this

The quarterback prediction problem : Forecasting the performance of college quarterbacks selected in the NFL draft. / Wolfson, Julian; Addona, Vittorio; Schmicker, Robert H.

In: Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, Vol. 7, No. 3, 12, 01.07.2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{314a8cc99b7941e395d125fde7a556ac,
title = "The quarterback prediction problem: Forecasting the performance of college quarterbacks selected in the NFL draft",
abstract = "National Football League (NFL) teams spend substantial time and money trying to predict which college quarterbacks eligible to be drafted into the NFL will have successful professional careers. But despite this investment of resources, it is common for quarterbacks to perform much better or worse than anticipated. Prior work on this {"}quarterback prediction problem{"} has concluded that NFL teams are poor at determining which quarterbacks are likely to be successful based on information available prior to the draft. However, these analyses have generally focused only on quarterbacks who played in the NFL, ignoring those who were drafted but did not appear in a professional game. Using data on all quarterbacks drafted since 1997, we considered the problem of predicting NFL success as defined by two metrics (games played and Net Points), based on when a quarterback was drafted and his performances in college and at the NFL Combine. Our analyses suggest that college and combine statistics have little value for predicting whether a quarterback will be successful in the NFL. Contrary to previous work, we conclude that NFL teams aggregate pre-draft information-including qualitative observations-quite effectively, and their inability to consistently identify college quarterbacks who will excel in the professional ranks is a consequence of random variability in future performance due to factors which are unlikely to be observable.",
keywords = "NFL, NFL draft, college football, football, prediction, quarterback",
author = "Julian Wolfson and Vittorio Addona and Schmicker, {Robert H.}",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2202/1559-0410.1302",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
journal = "Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports",
issn = "1559-0410",
publisher = "Berkeley Electronic Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The quarterback prediction problem

T2 - Forecasting the performance of college quarterbacks selected in the NFL draft

AU - Wolfson, Julian

AU - Addona, Vittorio

AU - Schmicker, Robert H.

PY - 2011/7/1

Y1 - 2011/7/1

N2 - National Football League (NFL) teams spend substantial time and money trying to predict which college quarterbacks eligible to be drafted into the NFL will have successful professional careers. But despite this investment of resources, it is common for quarterbacks to perform much better or worse than anticipated. Prior work on this "quarterback prediction problem" has concluded that NFL teams are poor at determining which quarterbacks are likely to be successful based on information available prior to the draft. However, these analyses have generally focused only on quarterbacks who played in the NFL, ignoring those who were drafted but did not appear in a professional game. Using data on all quarterbacks drafted since 1997, we considered the problem of predicting NFL success as defined by two metrics (games played and Net Points), based on when a quarterback was drafted and his performances in college and at the NFL Combine. Our analyses suggest that college and combine statistics have little value for predicting whether a quarterback will be successful in the NFL. Contrary to previous work, we conclude that NFL teams aggregate pre-draft information-including qualitative observations-quite effectively, and their inability to consistently identify college quarterbacks who will excel in the professional ranks is a consequence of random variability in future performance due to factors which are unlikely to be observable.

AB - National Football League (NFL) teams spend substantial time and money trying to predict which college quarterbacks eligible to be drafted into the NFL will have successful professional careers. But despite this investment of resources, it is common for quarterbacks to perform much better or worse than anticipated. Prior work on this "quarterback prediction problem" has concluded that NFL teams are poor at determining which quarterbacks are likely to be successful based on information available prior to the draft. However, these analyses have generally focused only on quarterbacks who played in the NFL, ignoring those who were drafted but did not appear in a professional game. Using data on all quarterbacks drafted since 1997, we considered the problem of predicting NFL success as defined by two metrics (games played and Net Points), based on when a quarterback was drafted and his performances in college and at the NFL Combine. Our analyses suggest that college and combine statistics have little value for predicting whether a quarterback will be successful in the NFL. Contrary to previous work, we conclude that NFL teams aggregate pre-draft information-including qualitative observations-quite effectively, and their inability to consistently identify college quarterbacks who will excel in the professional ranks is a consequence of random variability in future performance due to factors which are unlikely to be observable.

KW - NFL

KW - NFL draft

KW - college football

KW - football

KW - prediction

KW - quarterback

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80755130236&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80755130236&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2202/1559-0410.1302

DO - 10.2202/1559-0410.1302

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:80755130236

VL - 7

JO - Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports

JF - Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports

SN - 1559-0410

IS - 3

M1 - 12

ER -