The proportion of abstracts presented at the 2010 American academy of orthopaedic surgeons annual meeting ultimately published

Benjamin R. Williams, Will G Freking, Taylor J. Ridley, Julie Agel, Marc F. Swiontkowski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations


As attendees of orthopedic meetings consider how to integrate presented information into their practice, it is helpful to consider the quality of the data presented. One surrogate metric is the proportion of and changes to presented abstracts that become journal publications. With this study, using the 2010 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Annual Meeting abstracts, the authors sought to answer the following questions: Did the publications following abstract presentations differ in terms of the conclusions, study subjects, or coauthors? What proportion of abstracts was published? What are the most common subtopics and journals, and what is the most common author country? Keywords and authors from the 2010 AAOS Annual Meeting proceedings program (698 podium and 548 poster abstracts) were searched in PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar. If a publication resulted, differences in the conclusion, number of study subjects, and authorship between the abstract and the journal publication were tabulated. The proportion of abstracts published, specialty subtopics, authorship country, and journals of publication were collected. At journal publication, 1.7% of podium and 1.7% of poster conclusions changed. Mean number of authors for podium and poster increased significantly (P<.001), and 30% of podium and 44% of poster had a change in the number of study subjects. The overall journal publication percentage was 61% (68% podium and 53% poster). The majority of the authors were from the United States. The most common journal was The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. It is important to evaluate the usefulness and clinical applicability of meetings, especially the final disposition of conference abstracts, from various angles to ensure that they are as worthwhile and educational as possible. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(4):e263-e269.].

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)E263-E269
Issue number4
Early online dateApr 20 2020
StatePublished - Aug 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Slack Incorporated. All rights reserved.


Dive into the research topics of 'The proportion of abstracts presented at the 2010 American academy of orthopaedic surgeons annual meeting ultimately published'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this