The prevalence of glaucoma in the Melbourne Visual Impairment Project

Matthew D. Wensor, Cathy A. McCarty, Yury L. Stanislavsky, Patricia M. Livingston, Hugh R. Taylor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

313 Scopus citations


Purpose: The purpose of the study was to determine the prevalence of glaucoma in Melbourne, Australia. Methods: All subjects were participants in the Melbourne Visual Impairment Project (Melbourne VIP), a population-based prevalence study of eye disease that included residential and nursing home populations. Each participant underwent a standardized eye examination, which included a Humphrey Visual Field test, applanation tonometry, fundus examination including fundal photographs, and a medical history interview. Glaucoma status was determined by a masked assessment and consensus adjudication of visual fields, optic disc photographs, intraocular pressure, and glaucoma history. Results: A total of 3271 persons (83% response rate) participated in the residential Melbourne VIP. The overall prevalence rate of definite primary open-angle glaucoma in the residential population was 1.7% (95% confidence limits = 1.21, 2.21). Of these, 50% had not been diagnosed previously. Only two persons (0.1%) had primary angle-closure glaucoma and six persons (0.2%) had secondary glaucoma. The prevalence of glaucoma increased steadily with age from 0.1% at ages 40 to 49 years to 9.7% in persons aged 80 to 89 years. There was no relationship with gender. The authors examined 403 (90.2% response rate) nursing home residents. The age standardized rate for this component was 2.36% (95% confidence limits = 0, 4.88). Conclusion: The rate of glaucoma in Melbourne rises significantly with age. With only half of patients being diagnosed, glaucoma is a major eye health problem and will become increasingly important as the population ages.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)733-739
Number of pages7
Issue number4
StatePublished - Apr 1 1998


Dive into the research topics of 'The prevalence of glaucoma in the Melbourne Visual Impairment Project'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this