Abstract
This study examined five central issues regarding the classification of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in an epidemiologically derived sample of primary school children. A monothetic schema (DSM-III) differed from a polythetic-only schema (DSM-III-R) by having a higher frequency of comorbid conduct disorder. A pervasive model was too restrictive, identifying only the most severe disruptive or conduct disordered children. Raising the minimum threshold above eight symptoms (DSM-III-R) missed less disruptive children who nevertheless exhibit significant functional impairment. There was minimal support for the independence of a syndrome of attention deficit disorder without hyperactivity (DSM-III). Finally, ADHD patients commonly have other diagnoses, most frequently conduct disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, and anxiety disorder.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 155-165 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1993 |
Keywords
- attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder
- monothetic classification
- nosology
- polythetic classification
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Nosology of Attention-deficit Hyperactivity Disorder'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS